I added a Darwinports entry. Let me know if it needs fixing.
Actually, I went to MIT undergrad and I can see what Alexander is hiding
from and maybe he'll fix it. :)
--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSEE (6/86) + BSChem (3/95) + BAEnglish (8/95) + $2.50 = mocha latte
-
No, it's because I'm stuck in my office most of the day :-)
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> I could put it in this evening if you could tell me what the relation
> is. :)
>
> I'm not that sure myself. Maybe that's why Alexander writes most of the
> FAQ... :)
>
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003
I can do it. Let me make sure I put down an answer that is useful:
1) The problem only afflicts unstable, correct?
2) The problem is being fixed.
3) Users should start by updating those packages that are complaining.
4) If the update doesn't solve the problem, let the maintainer know.
On Mon, 3
One more change: sci/pymol-0.86-3 is the version which will be moved to
stable.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-deve
You might also want to look at their answer to the converse question.
"Why did Darwinports start from scratch..." at
http://www.opendarwin.org/projects/darwinports/en/faq.php
In short, he says that packaging systems are a new type of product, and
there will necessarily be experimentation until p
At 14:35 Uhr -0800 02.03.2003, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I could put it in this evening if you could tell me what the relation
is. :)
My take on this (other please correct/supplement me):
We are not really competing with them, rather we are working together
or complementing; of course there is ov
Maybe we can add a FAQ item on the libpng / libpng3 issue. I know we
are transiting to libpng3 anyway, but for those people in a (semi)
broken state already it would be nice if they had a way to find out
what is going on and how to get out of it. Also it would be
convenient for us: whenever a m
I could put it in this evening if you could tell me what the relation
is. :)
I'm not that sure myself. Maybe that's why Alexander writes most of the
FAQ... :)
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Max Horn wrote:
> We should add an entry to the FAQ, section 2 "Relations with Other
> Projects" that explains how ou
We should add an entry to the FAQ, section 2 "Relations with Other
Projects" that explains how our relations to darwinports /
opendarwin.org are... shouldn't we? I keep hearing that question on
IRC and the mailing lists.
Max
---
This sf.net e
GTK+2.2 packages are in experimental/msek/gnome2 already. But I cannot
move
them into unstable tree because fink will upgrade GTK+2.0 to GTK+2.2 and
fails if user have xfree86-4.2.
I'm wondering how to handle following situation:
build run
xfree864.2 4.3 4.2
Thanks to a report on fink-users, a problem with both libpng3 and the emacs21
packages was detected. (libpng3 was not properly running ranlib on libpng.a).
This has now been repaired, and the list of packages I will move to stable
during the "libpng move" next week now includes:
editors/emacs21-2
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 21:08, David R. Morrison wrote:
> We gotta get you on the Fink team, Anthony... you understand the Debian
> tools better than we do!
Thanks ;-)
>
> So how does Debian handle the situation where two different pacakges want
> to provide executables and/or man pages with the s
> But what about
> aterm?
aterm is not in the stable tree; I was only listing the packages there.
The packages (such as aterm) which are only in the unstable tree are
mostly already done.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkG
At 2:43 Uhr + 02.03.2003, Michel Salim wrote:
Hello,
Some people might have seen the article on Slashdot regarding the
security vulnerabilities of certain terminal emulation software,
most worryingly Eterm, that allow any files the user has write
access for, to be overwritten.
(Slashdot ar
14 matches
Mail list logo
