There are binary compatibility issues between code compiled with gcc 3.1
and gcc 3.3. We are still investigating these, to determine what the
impact will be on Fink. For now, I advise everyone to stick with gcc 3.1
for their compiles.
-- Dave
-
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 09:10 AM, Thomas Kotzian wrote:
linc1 can't find a file during install phase.
the maintainer doesn't respond after a few weeks so i write to the
mailing-list.
here's the output:
Thomas,
Update your opensp3 and openjade packages, it should then work.
Peter
---
linc1 can't find a file during install phase.
the maintainer doesn't respond after a few weeks so i write to the
mailing-list.
here's the output:
-- Fixing Crossreferences
cd . && gtkdoc-fixxref --module-dir=html
--html-dir=/sw/share/gtk-doc/html
touch html-build.stamp
make[2]: Nothing to be d
> "David" == David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Due to hardware issues anonymous CVS is served from the backup
David> servers, AFAIK. This is a sourceforge issue. We apologise for the
David> hassle this causes but unfortunately we cannot do a thing ;) about it.
And so it's been broken
On Dienstag, Juni 24, 2003, at 04:49 Uhr, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Am I doing something wrong? I've been unable to get a good solid CVS
update in the past week. Either I can't connect with the server, or
when I do, the update proceeds v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y (taking about five
minutes to get to 10
It must be on the sourceforge end: I've been having the same problem.
Looking at the commits, it looks like there's machinery in the works to
allow CVS updates from the opendarwin mirror in addition, for this very
reason.
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 10:49, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Am I doing someth
Does anyone know if there are any compatibility issues with compiling
from fink source with Apple's gcc 3.3 compiler? I'm sure using
gcc_select would get around any issues, but I've yet to check anything
out.
TIA
Ben
---
This SF.Net email i
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 10:18 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
We need a system similar to that of other Fink packages, where both
xfree86
and system-xfree86 are split into -dev, -shlibs, and main packages, and
we use a build depenency only for system-xfree86-dev (which would be
the
part whic
Am I doing something wrong? I've been unable to get a good solid CVS
update in the past week. Either I can't connect with the server, or
when I do, the update proceeds v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y (taking about five
minutes to get to 10.2 - the interesting bits!) and then times out
midway through that.
Dear fink-devel,
We need to do some further work on our system-xfree86 package.
Imagine a user who is interested in doing binary-only installs of Fink
packages. We already know that such a user won't need the Developer tools,
because no compiling will be done. Similarly, such a user does not ne
In the FAQ it says to remove the package (by force if necessary) and
reinstall it--just do the latter at some point.
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge
11 matches
Mail list logo
