Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 01:23 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I'm still a bit unclear about what your change would accomplish, Peter. BuildDepends is not passed to dpkg. We use that only within Fink. As you suggest, when the shared libraries plan is fully implemented, we'll only have to

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread David R. Morrison
Ah, I get it now. I guess for me, a certain workaround has become such a habit that I forgot about why I do it. Namely, when I want to build a package foo which has a shlibs splitoff, I just do fink build foo-shlibs to avoid the extra installation. -- Dave

Re: [Fink-devel] New June2003 assembler broken

2003-06-30 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 29.06.03 um 18:48 Uhr schrieb Martin Costabel: The gcc-3.3 woes are already starting. People who installed the new Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg cannot compile the atlas package any more. The problem was reported to the beginners list today, and I tracked it down to the new as. I sent the

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread David R. Morrison
Hi Max. If you do fink build foo then indeed foo-shlibs gets installed. My understanding of the logic is this: both Depends and BuildDepends are checked for whether they are installed or not, when fink build foo is processed. Since foo-shlibs is not yet installed, the command fink install

Re: [Fink-devel] New June2003 assembler broken

2003-06-30 Thread Martin Costabel
On lundi, juin 30, 2003, at 18:32 Europe/Paris, Max Horn wrote: So do you know for sure this is a bug in gas; or isn't it possible that they changed the syntax? Or some other parts of the assembler. No, I only know that 1. the atlas package does compile with the dec2002 dev tools and it doesn't

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread TheSin
Max is right, when using build it doen't install either, I do it all the time. On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Max Horn wrote: First off: if you just do a fink build foo, then neither foo nor foo-shlibs should be installed. If latest Fink does that, it's a regression; it didn't use to

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread TheSin
this is indeed not true, I just tried it. On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 11:18 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: If you do fink build foo then indeed foo-shlibs gets installed. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites

[Fink-devel] Do you remember me?

2003-06-30 Thread Bernie Wagner
7vnwtt204xov8c8vei3412nrn Stop Mailings Here ym2dmp3tb2h8l7l63mb7jyuh

[Fink-devel] Postgresql doesn't startup anymore.

2003-06-30 Thread Andrea Riciputi
Hi, as discussed two weeks ago on [Fink-Users] I'm not able to startup Postgresql after updating it to version 7.3.3. I got the following error: shell-init: could not get current directory: getcwd: cannot access parent directories: Permission denied Can anyone help me to fix this problem, and

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Postgresql doesn't startup anymore.

2003-06-30 Thread steve_w
Quoting Andrea Riciputi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, as discussed two weeks ago on [Fink-Users] I'm not able to startup Postgresql after updating it to version 7.3.3. I got the following error: shell-init: could not get current directory: getcwd: cannot access parent directories: Permission

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 03:07 AM, TheSin wrote: this is indeed not true, I just tried it. On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 11:18 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: If you do fink build foo then indeed foo-shlibs gets installed. In that case, please feel free to beat me around the head with a wet

[Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

2003-06-30 Thread Martin Costabel
Andrew Pinski wrote: The as error is right here, the problem is gcc is producing wrong asm, I will look into it. OK, I hunted it down. It is really too silly: The code produced by a fortran STOP statement (without optional stop-code) is treated as an error by the new assembler. Definitely a

[Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

2003-06-30 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Monday, Jun 30, 2003, at 19:14 US/Eastern, Martin Costabel wrote: Andrew Pinski wrote: The as error is right here, the problem is gcc is producing wrong asm, I will look into it. OK, I hunted it down. It is really too silly: The code produced by a fortran STOP statement (without optional

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging Question

2003-06-30 Thread David R. Morrison
There are two ways to resolve the versioning issue. One is to rename the package. The other is to use the relatively new Epoch field in fink. All versions with epoch = 1 are regarded as newer than all versions with epoch = 0 (the default). Epochs should only be used in special cases, but this

[Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs

2003-06-30 Thread John Davidorff Pell
I'm not sure where i should send the question, but here goes: when i do fink selfupdate-cvs it has decided to so su pell -c 'cvs ...' where i have NEVER had it do the cvs update as anything other than root. i'm confused. where is this setting? how do I reset it? help? thanx, JP -- God is