Re: [Fink-devel] Re: packages that are part of the system

On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 10:14 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 08:02 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: Tcltk: this one is a little odd: Apple has provided tcl, but not tk...? i'm at a loss... Check the list archives-- I believe someone figured out that Tk is an extra

Fwd: [Fink-devel] Re: packages that are part of the system

On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 8:05 AM, David wrote: On Samstag, Juli 26, 2003, at 02:02 Uhr, John Davidorff Pell wrote: Here's my rationale for wanting some fink packages to be removed (or a system-foo package created??): Hello. While I appreciate all the effort you made to list those package

Fwd: [Fink-devel] Re: packages that are part of the system

On Sunday, July 27, 2003, at 6:16 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 05:02 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: Zsh: version 4.0.4 is provided by panther, the current fink version is 4.0.6 -snip much- I don't understand why you listed all these packages which fink has later version

[Fink-devel] Giving up packages: postfix.* and gdal

Hey, Both postfix-release and gdal need updating, and I haven't had time recently to do what needs to be done. Having an unstable computer doesn't help things. Anyway, if anyone would like to take over those packages, I would appreciate it. There are newer postfix packages than those in CVS i

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: packages that are part of the system

On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 05:02 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: Zsh: version 4.0.4 is provided by panther, the current fink version is 4.0.6 -snip much- I don't understand why you listed all these packages which fink has later versions. That's kinda the point of fink. Users want the latest

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: packages that are part of the system

does it come with ldap support? I think not, the reason for all of these pkgs are a) missing build time features b) so we link again finks version and not apples, linking against apples can totally kill fink if apple decides to release un updated lib and we didn't know this way fink can make

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

Andrew Pinski wrote: Just to keep you guys up to date on this problem, this is fixed in the FSF's CVS version of gcc by: . Thanks for the information. Since this patch does not apply directly to the gcc-3.3 sources, I changed it somewhat so

[Fink-devel] Re: Fink documents hacked during install on OSX

Am Sonntag, 27.07.03 um 17:43 Uhr schrieb Lewis Pusey: The following is the message I sent to Debian and is related to the Fink install on Mac. Err, hu? You sent a message to "debian" (what does that mean, some debian mailing list?) related to Fink? Fink is completely separate project of Debia

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

Just to keep you guys up to date on this problem, this is fixed in the FSF's CVS version of gcc by: . Thanks, Andrew Pinski On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 10:25 US/Eastern, Andrew Pinski wrote: A workaround is to use -mdynamic-no-pic (that

Re: [Fink-devel] submitted packages

Hi James, I will find sometime this week to look at them. Cheers Matt On Sunday, Jul 27, 2003, at 05:36 Australia/Canberra, James Gibbs wrote: Hi, anyone care to check my three Advance packages, AdvanceMame, AdvanceMenu, and AdvanceScan. They have been in the tracker since June 14. They shou

Re: [Fink-devel] submitted packages

On Samstag, Juli 26, 2003, at 09:36 Uhr, James Gibbs wrote: Hi, anyone care to check my three Advance packages, AdvanceMame, AdvanceMenu, and AdvanceScan. They have been in the tracker since June 14. They should be totally fine. Many packages submitted after my packages have already been accep

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: packages that are part of the system

I'm not sure if you got a response to your initial message or not. Apple has added a number of new open source pacakges with each major release of OS X. So far, fink's philosophy has been to keep providing a fink version of the package, even after Apple is providing their own. (The only exception