Re: [Fink-devel] packaging question

2003-08-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 05:58 AM, Joe Block wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am creating a package for python23 docs, and have run into the problem that the tar file is named html-2.3.tar.bz, but expands into a directory tree named Python-Docs-2.3. It was easy eno

[Fink-devel] packaging question

2003-08-18 Thread Joe Block
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am creating a package for python23 docs, and have run into the problem that the tar file is named html-2.3.tar.bz, but expands into a directory tree named Python-Docs-2.3. It was easy enough to rename the tar file in /sw/src and get fink to create

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86-43 and mozilla

2003-08-18 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 07:51 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Viv Kendon wrote: Pick one: [1] <- I picked 2 The following 3 packages will be installed or updated: mozilla-browser mozilla-psm mozilla-shlibs The following 12 additional packages will be

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: system-xfree86_4.3 ?

2003-08-18 Thread Martin Costabel
Martin Costabel wrote: Actually, the part that looks for the X version is problematic, too: It runs "X -version", and this does not work if you are not logged in on the console. So you cannot do this update remotely via ssh. "Does not work" means "hangs indefinitely". This should be illegal for

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems with system-xfree86

2003-08-18 Thread Martin Costabel
Rohan Lloyd wrote: There was a recent change to split system-xfree86 into 4.2 and 4.3 versions. When I do a fink update, I got the following error: [] system-xfree86 conflicts with x11 system-xfree86-42 provides x11 and is to be installed. This has been discussed a couple of hours ago on this