[Fink-devel] Committing policy reversion

2004-03-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
After some discussion on i18n, it appears that delaying the activation of the English docs wasn't as useful as we had initially thought. Because of this, we'll go back to the way it was before: whomever does the mods commits and activates immediately. Thanks for your patience as we work out t

Re: [Fink-devel] New pathsetup.sh

2004-03-16 Thread Martin Costabel
On 16 mars 2004, at 16:21, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi Martin. How do you think we should include this with the bindist? Should we put your .app on the disk in place of the current .command file? How should the postinstall script of the bindist be set up? Should this shell script be include

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: gnubg-0.12-22

2004-03-16 Thread Ross Nelson
That worked fine. Thanks. -- ross Peter O'Gorman wrote: Matthias Neeracher wrote: On Mar 15, 2004, at 5:31 PM, Ross Nelson wrote: I just installed fink for the first time and I just tried a binary install of gnubg to see if fink was working, and though it seems to be in other respects, I go

Re: [Fink-devel] New pathsetup.sh

2004-03-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Hi Martin. How do you think we should include this with the bindist? Should we put your .app on the disk in place of the current .command file? How should the postinstall script of the bindist be set up? Should this shell script be included with fink itself, in case someone wants to run it from