Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
2. This beasty needs access to internal files from the tcl and tk
sources to build. I was thinking that the info file could grab tcl
and tk of the right version and build against those (using SourceN).
If these are some internal headers that the Fink tcltk package does not
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:59:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I did some research on tclx and it looks like there hasn't been an explicit
> release in 2 years, but one of the developers emailed me back and said to get
> it from cvs. So I did and I can get it to work, so I have
hi all,
I did some research on tclx and it looks like there hasn't been an explicit
release in 2 years, but one of the developers emailed me back and said to get
it from cvs. So I did and I can get it to work, so I have some questions on
packaging this beast...
1. How should I manage the source
TheSin wrote:
no apache2 no ssl doesn't build ldap support as fink only have openldap-ssl
Ahh, thanks. Didn't know that.
Blair
--
Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
---
This SF.Net e
Daniel Macks wrote:
Any thoughts?
All for it.
-d
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_
Hi All,
I saw there was a message from SÃbastien a week or two ago about TclX and I
now need TclX for a Tcl/Tk GUI wrapper program. Has anyone started on TclX?
Looks like the latest version is 8.3.5 from Oct 2002. The neosoft.com page
is gone, but sf.net/projects/tclx is still there.
-kurt
In .info files, if a Source: is not listed, a default of %n-%v.tar.gz
is used, which is documented as being for "manual download". I'm
proposing we phase out this default. I think it has outlived its
usefulness. Consider: .gz compression is hardly as standard as it once
was for source things. With
