Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Providing default /sw/var/lib/debfoster/keepers with base-files package?

2005-01-22 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Jan 20, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: If a user is not carfull the system might end up unusable due to e.g. a missing apt while running with UseBinaryDist. That's not an "unusable" state, since fink will merely issue a "please install the apt pkg" warning. But anyway... I think what was

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Providing default /sw/var/lib/debfoster/keepers with base-files package?

2005-01-22 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Jan 20, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: If a user is not carfull the system might end up unusable due to e.g. a missing apt while running with UseBinaryDist. That's not an "unusable" state, since fink will merely issue a "please install the apt pkg" warning. But anyway... I think what was

Re: [Fink-devel] Providing default /sw/var/lib/debfoster/keepers with base-files package?

2005-01-22 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 20, 2005, at 9:47 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Dear Fink Developers We recommend more and more often to use the debfoster fink package to keep track of unneeded packages on a Fink installation. One problem that users are facing with debfoster