On 07/05/2005, at 12:58 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Wyeth wrote:
[]
2) If anyone could explain how to avoid the warnings generated
by fink validate relating to the InstallScript, PostInstScript
and PreRmScript it would be most appreciated. Specifically I
have used numerous loops wh
On May 6, 2005, at 8:47 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
The licensing documentation says
"BSD - for BSD-style licenses. This includes the so-called "original"
BSD license, the "modified" BSD license and the MIT license. The
Apache license also counts as BSD. With these licenses the
distribution of
On May 6, 2005, at 8:38 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
Guys, you confuse me :) Should I use BSD or not, or something else?
thanks,
- Koen.
The licensing documentation says
"BSD - for BSD-style licenses. This includes the so-called "original"
BSD license, the "modified" BSD license and the MIT lice
Guys, you confuse me :) Should I use BSD or not, or something else?
thanks,
- Koen.
On May 6, 2005, at 5:23 AM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On May 2, 2005, at 19:58, Alexander Strange wrote:
That looks functionally identical to the BSD license with the
advertising clause.
I think you mean WITHOUT t
On May 6, 2005, at 2:47 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
I think I've been quite consistent putting the conditional expression
*before* the thing the conditional controls.
Depends: (%type_pkg[perl] < 581) time-hires-pm (>= 1.50-1)
ConfigureParams: (%type_pkg[ssl]) --with-ssl
Note that the versioning req
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:21:55AM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote:
> On May 6, 2005, at 4:07 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> >Any thoughts about a syntax like:
> >
> > License: (cond1) Lic1, (cond2) Lic2, ..., (condN) LicN, LicX
> >
> >where cond* are each usual condional syntax and Lic* are each standard
Le 6 mai 2005 à 18:10, Martin Costabel a écrit :
Michèle Garoche wrote:
In case the maintainer has no access to Tiger, cced here:
Hi Jeff,
I've just tried to install ImageMagick on 10.4 transitional.
Compiling seems to get well, but when using display and clicking
on the image to get the menu
Dan,
Can we just ignore the dependency problem with the proposed pymol 0.98-1
package for now? Specifically when used with the revised glut_3.7-24 and
freeglut_2.2.0-2 packaging that is now in 10.3 and 10.4-transitional unstable
it is impossible for a package that uses either freeglut-shlibs or
Daniel Wyeth wrote:
[]
2) If anyone could explain how to avoid the warnings generated by fink
validate relating to the InstallScript, PostInstScript and PreRmScript
it would be most appreciated. Specifically I have used numerous loops
which are only properly executed when the section in wh
On May 6, 2005, at 4:07 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Any thoughts about a syntax like:
License: (cond1) Lic1, (cond2) Lic2, ..., (condN) LicN, LicX
where cond* are each usual condional syntax and Lic* are each standard
License types? The result is the Lic of the first true cond
encountered in the list
On May 2, 2005, at 19:58, Alexander Strange wrote:
That looks functionally identical to the BSD license with the
advertising clause.
I think you mean WITHOUT the advertising clause. The BSD advertising
clause says that the notice must appear in all ads, documentation,
etc. talking about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel Macks wrote:
> For example:
>
> Package: foo-%type_raw[crypto]
> Type: crypto (ssl tls)
> License: (%type_raw[crypto] = ssl) Restrctive, GPL
>
> for a program "foo" that can use different crypto back-ends and whose
> own program is
Any thoughts about a syntax like:
License: (cond1) Lic1, (cond2) Lic2, ..., (condN) LicN, LicX
where cond* are each usual condional syntax and Lic* are each standard
License types? The result is the Lic of the first true cond
encountered in the list. A final non-conditional LicX would be
requir
13 matches
Mail list logo
