RE: [Fink-devel] Mismatched checksums are actually the same

2005-11-02 Thread Doug Ransom
I'll make the change. Should I have been able to figure this out from the documentation? Doug -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter O'Gorman Sent: November 2, 2005 8:22 PM To: Doug Ransom Cc: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [

Re: [Fink-devel] Mismatched checksums are actually the same

2005-11-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Doug Ransom wrote: | InstallScript: << | #! /bin/sh -ev | cp %b/pdftohtml %p/bin | | << | " Since there is no install target in the Makefile, I'd use install. InstallScript: << ~ install -d -m 755 %i/bin ~ install -m 755 pdftohtml %i/bin << You al

Re: [Fink-devel] validation question

2005-11-02 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:23:53PM -0500, Koen van der Drift wrote: > Hi, > > For my package biopython-py, I get a lot of errors like these when I > vaildate the .deb file: > > Error: Compiled python module points to fink install dir. > Offending file: /sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Bi

[Fink-devel] validation question

2005-11-02 Thread Koen van der Drift
Hi, For my package biopython-py, I get a lot of errors like these when I vaildate the .deb file: Error: Compiled python module points to fink install dir. Offending file: /sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Bio/ __init__.pyc I guess the files get installed in the wrong place. What woul

RE: [Fink-devel] Mismatched checksums are actually the same

2005-11-02 Thread Doug Ransom
Doh! Thanks, I needed another pair of eyes on that. It's for pdftohtml, which I am creating the package for. It compiles now, the info file is below. I am not convinced the InstallScript section is correct (it works, but is it right?). I also don't know how to include the binary in the pack

Re: [Fink-devel] Mismatched checksums are actually the same

2005-11-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Doug Ransom wrote: [] The file "pdftohtml-0.36.tar.gz" already exists but its checksum does not match. The most likely cause for this is a corrupted or incomplete download Expected: Package: 75ad095bb51e1f66c9f7691e6af12f44 The "Package:" should not be there. What package is this? Actual: 75a

Re: [Fink-devel] user MAKEFLAGS

2005-11-02 Thread Martin Costabel
David Fang wrote: Hi, General fink question: At some point in fink history, I was able to setenv MAKEFLAGS -j2 and have fink pick that up during compiles. (Running a dual 500 MHz G4, needs all the help it can get!). Some time this year, I noticed that fink no longer picks up my MAKEFLAGS

[Fink-devel] Mismatched checksums are actually the same

2005-11-02 Thread Doug Ransom
I am baffled by how to proceed with this error message on a fink fetch, since the checksums are the same:     Reading package info... Updating package index... done. Information about 5042 packages read in 30 seconds. (1)     Delete it and download again (2) Assume it is a partia

[Fink-devel] user MAKEFLAGS

2005-11-02 Thread David Fang
Hi, General fink question: At some point in fink history, I was able to setenv MAKEFLAGS -j2 and have fink pick that up during compiles. (Running a dual 500 MHz G4, needs all the help it can get!). Some time this year, I noticed that fink no longer picks up my MAKEFLAGS, resulting in slowe

Re: [Fink-devel] license + revision numbering questions

2005-11-02 Thread Rogue
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:42:03 -0800 Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 01 November 2005 at 14:38, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > > > also from a pratical point of view when uploading info files > > > should I be iterating the revision number even though the package > > > has not