Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Fink binary distributions

2005-11-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Rogue wrote: [] I suppose what I'm trying to say, on a more sinister tone, is how do you ensure the seriously packaged .info/.patches are not drown into the mass of hobbyists contributions? how do you ensure that you don't kill the motivation of the dedicated individuals? My €0.02: Finks main

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

2005-11-07 Thread Martin Costabel
I am answering in a new thread. It is a pity that you started this thread inside the one on the fink binary distribution. Rogue wrote: > I have gtk+ 2.6.10 installed but configure steps now fail saying gtk+ test can't be run. checking the config.log file I'm stumped by what has happened: > >

Re: [Fink-devel] htmldoc compiling broken in 10.4.2/ 10.4.x?

2005-11-07 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:42:32AM +, Murali Vadivelu wrote: > Default compiler has been set to: > gcc version 4.0.0 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5026) > ./configure --prefix=/sw --mandir=${prefix}/share/man > --with-openssl-libs=/sw/lib --with-openssl-includes=/sw/include > --with-fltk-libs=/

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

2005-11-07 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 11/7/05, Rogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have gtk+ 2.6.10 installed but configure steps now fail saying gtk+ test > can't be run. checking the config.log file I'm stumped by what has happened: > > configure:27156: checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.4.0 > configure:27301: result: no > configu

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 check error

2005-11-07 Thread Rogue
I have gtk+ 2.6.10 installed but configure steps now fail saying gtk+ test can't be run. checking the config.log file I'm stumped by what has happened: configure:27156: checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.4.0 configure:27301: result: no configure:27334: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -no-cpp-precomp -

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Fink binary distributions

2005-11-07 Thread Rogue
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:38:18 -0500 "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > some of the packages that sit in the tracker do so because > they just flat don't work on anybody's system other than the > submitter's and are awaiting fixes, or otherwise do not comply with > Fink policies--and

[Fink-devel] [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-07 Thread shenanigans
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 community webapp. Our newest version adds broadcast vide

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Fink binary distributions

2005-11-07 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 11/7/05, Rogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:30:23 -0500 > "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is also the issue of lack of maintainership, which is harder to solve. > > Looking closely some of the dependencies that the packages I endeavour to > mai

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Fink binary distributions

2005-11-07 Thread Rogue
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:30:23 -0500 "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is also the issue of lack of maintainership, which is harder to solve. Looking closely some of the dependencies that the packages I endeavour to maintain have no maintainer so I'll be gradually be working