A few days ago I submitted compiler/assembler/debugger/newlib for
6811/6812 (Motorola/Freescale micro controller).
I also have a m68hc1x-gel.info (gnu embedded library) file, but I did
not yet submit it. It does not compile the library, nor the
testsuite. Its quality is not yet at fink level
I think fink validate should do this test. I am aware of the fact
that fink validate is (at this moment) a very bare test. But to me it
seems the most logical place to validate that the package can be used
in "stable".
Carl.
---
This SF.N
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Do we assume that if a user is forging $distribution, it should only
be for use within fink itself (for dep-checking and listing), not
actually to be able to install these packages?
Yes, I think so. We should assume that it's in dry-run mode.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:47:25AM -0400, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> >>Yeah, but neither works for other tree than the one I am using right
> >>now, do they?
> >
> >By "other tree", you mean in the Distribution sense (can't check 10.3
> >from a 10.
On Apr 6, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Yeah, but neither works for other tree than the one I am using right
now, do they?
By "other tree", you mean in the Distribution sense (can't check 10.3
from a 10.4-transitional machine; can't check intel from a powerpc
machine) right? The --tree
