Hi Folks:
It seems I've opened a can of worms. Sorry.
My original concern was whether a significant number of users are
turning away from fink in favor of other options, and if so, whether
this was due to reasons that are valid and ought to be addressed.
The first response snapped me out of
On Nov 11, 2006, at 12:23 PM, William Scott wrote:
1. Is there in fact significant dissatisfaction? (Lots of people
use alternatives like MacPorts, but that doesn't mean that they have
all rejected fink. If someone uses an alternative, or does stuff
manually, as a matter of taste, I
On 11/11/06, Neil Tiffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 11, 2006, at 12:23 PM, William Scott wrote:
1. Is there in fact significant dissatisfaction? (Lots of people
use alternatives like MacPorts, but that doesn't mean that they have
all rejected fink. If someone uses an alternative,
The attached packaging now properly allows multilib builds of the
c, c++, objc, fortran and java languages on Darwin PPC for both
32-bit and 64-bit processor machines. It also will allow Darwin
Intel to do a --disable-multilib build of the same (since the
the x86_64 Darwin build of java is still
Dear Developers and Users.
In the wake of the ongoing discussion I am going to offer myself as an
archiver.
The Fink Wiki is of course there for everyone to add their ideas and
improvements, but history has shown that human mankind is 'lazy'
I will track the threads and I will try to extract
