Re: [Fink-devel] slib-gu16-2d6-1003

2006-11-13 Thread Dave Reiser
Caleb Mattoon wrote: > Trying to install slib-gu16 (to satisfy recommended dependancies for > gnucash-2.0): > > > Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that > the package is simply not installable and a bug report against > that package should be filed. > The followi

[Fink-devel] slib-gu16-2d6-1003

2006-11-13 Thread Caleb Mattoon
Trying to install slib-gu16 (to satisfy recommended dependancies for gnucash-2.0):Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely thatthe package is simply not installable and a bug report againstthat package should be filed.The following information may help to resolve the situa

Re: [Fink-devel] SUMMARY: fink vs. alternatives (long) (thanks Neil)

2006-11-13 Thread Neil Tiffin
On Nov 12, 2006, at 4:06 PM, David H wrote: > This is also based on the fact that I rarely get feedback. If I knew > that my package is widely used I have a commitment to that small users > base that my package has. As a diligent person I would be more obliged > to actually update those packages

Re: [Fink-devel] revised gcc4 packaging

2006-11-13 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Jack Howarth wrote: > Jeff, >We may need to take this onto the gcc mailing list since > I don't have a Mac Intel machine to test with. However, my > understanding was that all of Sandro's patches were applied > to gcc 4.2 and did build libffi and libjava on MacIntel (but > not at -m64). Are you

Re: [Fink-devel] freeglut in stable?

2006-11-13 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:11:12PM -0800, William Scott wrote: > > Using > > I found only 3 packages in stable that use glut instead of freeglut, > one of which (molmol) is mine and works fine with freeglut (molmol in > unstable uses freeglut, and is ready to move into stable as soon as >