[Fink-devel] Followup: What would cause this error?

2006-12-03 Thread Murali Vadivelu
Solved by removing %p/share/apps/konqsidebartng from the Finder On 4 Dec 2006, at 01:37, Murali Vadivelu wrote: > Unpacking replacement kdebase3-unified ... > /sw_10.4/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw_10.4/fink/dists/unstable/ > main/binary-darwin-powerpc/kde/kdebase3-unified_3.5.5-1021_darwin-

[Fink-devel] Takeover of gnujaxp

2006-12-03 Thread Trevor Harmon
On the recommendation of Christian Schaffner, I am taking over maintenance of the gnujaxp package. See: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=1406369&group_id=17203&atid=414256 Trevor - Take Surveys.

[Fink-devel] What would cause this error?

2006-12-03 Thread Murali Vadivelu
Unpacking replacement kdebase3-unified ... /sw_10.4/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw_10.4/fink/dists/unstable/main/ binary-darwin-powerpc/kde/kdebase3-unified_3.5.5-1021_darwin- powerpc.deb (--install): unable to stat `./sw_10.4/share/apps/konqsidebartng/dirtree/ bookmarks_module.desktop' (which I

[Fink-devel] Shlibs policy modification (64bit libraries)

2006-12-03 Thread David R. Morrison
Fink's Shlibs policy has been updated to handle 64bit libraries and 'fat' libraries. Effective immediately, any fink package which installs shared 64bit or 'fat' libraries should use a modified form of the Shlibs field in which either "64" or "32-64", as appropriate, has been appended to t

Re: [Fink-devel] conflict between xml-sax-expat-pm and xml-sax-pm ?

2006-12-03 Thread Koen van der Drift
> Good weirdness-detection! Check the .deb for the package with: > > dpkg-deb -I /sw/fink/whatver/xml-sax-expat-pm581_whatever.deb > postint > > to see if the problem (bin instead of sbin) is in the .deb itself vs a > problem with how dpkg it handling it. If the .deb doesn't match the > .info,

Re: [Fink-devel] mailman breaks signatures?

2006-12-03 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 12/3/06, Roland Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks! > > My mail from 0:06 got mangled by mailman in a way that broke both > digital signatures attached to it: it reformatted the MIME headers of > all parts, which is a problem since the attachments are also > encapsulated in the signed bl

[Fink-devel] mailman breaks signatures?

2006-12-03 Thread Roland Kuhn
Hi folks! My mail from 0:06 got mangled by mailman in a way that broke both digital signatures attached to it: it reformatted the MIME headers of all parts, which is a problem since the attachments are also encapsulated in the signed block. This is definitely not good style, so who do I c