Am 22.12.2006 um 07:52 schrieb Martin Costabel:
Max Horn wrote:
For some reasons I didn't update my Fink installation for some time.
So today I run a cvs up in /sw/fink, then sudo fink list -o
This resulted in the following error:
Failed: Error performing percent expansion: unknown %
Le 18 déc. 2006 à 00:07, Tomoaki Okayama a écrit :
Dear maintainers,
I changed Depends: and BuildDepends: fields of following packages:
* jadetex.info
I'm sorry to inform you that your changes seem to have completely
broken html and pdf production of sgml based files at least when
Max Horn wrote:
Am 22.12.2006 um 07:52 schrieb Martin Costabel:
Max Horn wrote:
For some reasons I didn't update my Fink installation for some time.
So today I run a cvs up in /sw/fink, then sudo fink list -o
This resulted in the following error:
Failed: Error performing percent
Le 22 déc. 2006 à 11:45, Martin Costabel a écrit :Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 18 déc. 2006 à 00:07, Tomoaki Okayama a écrit : Dear maintainers,I changed Depends: and BuildDepends: fields of following packages:* jadetex.info I'm sorry to inform you that your changes seem to have completely broken
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
However, IMHO discussion on IRC are a very bad way to make decissions
about the fate of Fink. Clearly IRC is a great way to discuss these
things raw, but it also excludes many Fink developers from the
discussion, plus it's
Benjamin Reed wrote:
[]
http://www.trilug.org/~ranger/irc_logs/public/fink-2006-12-21.log
Search for Fingolfin
OK, so it boils down to whether the following is true or not:
14:25 dmacks drm: Ayup...fink (at least older versions, dunno
currently) scans ConfigureParams during indexing.
--
Michèle Garoche wrote:
[]
The only evidence I have for it is that it worked perfectly two days
before the changes, then did not work one day after it. So certainly
related to this change, given that I have not updated during this time.
Is this the same error as seen by others:
etex -ini
Thanks, that's good to know, I'm not sure why it wasn't coming up but
hopefully it will next time we try.
Regards, Wayne Boucher
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On 12/21/06, Murali Vadivelu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the unstable tree enabled? It is entirely possible that
--
Package manager version: 0.25.2
Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync i386
Mac OS X version: 10.4.8
Xcode version: 2.4.1
gcc version: 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)
make version: 3.80
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
On 12/20/06, Jean-Francois Sygnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Package manager version: 0.25.2
Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync i386
Mac OS X version: 10.4.8
Xcode version: 2.4.1
gcc version: 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)
make version: 3.80
On 12/22/06, Murali Vadivelu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wayne,
Can you 'locate' ccpnmr-py.info file and check whether Type: says
'(2.3 2.4)', please? It is possible that Fink maintainer(s) who added
my package description file remove 2.4 by mistake because my original
info file would say
11 matches
Mail list logo
