[Fink-devel] tar/spotlight (was Re: gcc42 mixed result)

2007-01-29 Thread David R. Morrison
On Jan 28, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > David Fang wrote: > [] >> Perhaps something about Spotlight disabling could be added to the >> FAQ? It makes a somewhat noticeable improvement on slow >> machines. I'd >> recommend disabling for at least the src/fink.build directorie

Re: [Fink-devel] tar/spotlight (was Re: gcc42 mixed result)

2007-01-29 Thread Charles Lepple
On 1/29/07, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070124 > /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages > dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in > `/sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages/ > gcc42_4.1.-20070124_darwin-i386.

Re: [Fink-devel] tar/spotlight (was Re: gcc42 mixed result)

2007-01-29 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: [] > dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070124 > /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages > dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in > `/sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages/ > gcc42_4.1.-20070124_darwin-i386.deb'. > tar: > ./sw/lib/gcc4.

Re: [Fink-devel] tar/spotlight (was Re: gcc42 mixed result)

2007-01-29 Thread Charles Lepple
On 1/29/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible (since we are on 2-processor machines > here) that some thread of "make install" hasn't quite finished when > dpkg-deb is already starting to wrap up? As another datapoint, I have seen the "file changed as we read it" error on

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

2007-01-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 1/24/07, Kasper Peeters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If it can be built from scratch on OS X, then that's a great start! > > My main problem is that I don't have access to a Mac. So I am looking > for someone with a Mac who can help me do the packaging. > > Best, > Kasper > > I can help out.

[Fink-devel] Installing virtual (provided) packages

2007-01-29 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi, I opened a feature request a while ago and provided a patch implementing a solution: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=367203&aid=1635337&group_id=17203 I am wondering if you consider this a worthwhile addition. If nobody sees a problem with it I would like to commit it.