Hi
On 26.01.2007, at 14:27, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 26.01.2007 um 17:06 schrieb Christian Schaffner:
>
> [...]
>>
>> I started playing with it a little bit, indeed (e.g. adding a
>> Description search field). And I agree with you that we should
>> replace all those packages with your browse.ph
On 2/1/07, Daniel Ferrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
> I want to contribute to this wonderful project, I'd like to be the
> manteiner for some "un-manteined" packages. I'll like to start with
> "dosunix" package, I've already compiled dosunix 1.0.14 and made the
> associated fink package.
Hi all.
I want to contribute to this wonderful project, I'd like to be the
manteiner for some "un-manteined" packages. I'll like to start with
"dosunix" package, I've already compiled dosunix 1.0.14 and made the
associated fink package.
I've subscribed to the fink-devel list and I'm waiting
On 1 Feb 2007, at 16:42, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Martin Costabel wrote:
>> Kevin Horton wrote:
>> []
>>> Please confirm that your lie and modglue packages will be added
>>> to fink sometime in the near future. For now we will use the
>>> ones from your exp directory.
>> There is no real ob
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Kevin Horton wrote:
> []
>> Please confirm that your lie and modglue packages will be added to
>> fink sometime in the near future. For now we will use the ones from
>> your exp directory.
>
> There is no real obstacle to adding them, except that I have done
> virtua
I've created an entry on the fink tracking
system for a placekeeper for the next revision
of the new gcc42 package. I plan on updating it
weekly to the latest gcc 4.2 branch snapshot so
we can have the state of gcc 4.2 branch tested
more widely. Currently Apple doesn't do daily
regression testin
