Re: [Fink-devel] lpsolve looking for new maintainer

2007-02-06 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 07 Feb 2007, at 03:12, Trevor Harmon wrote: > I'm the official maintainer of the lpsolve and lpsolve-java packages, > but unfortunately I no longer have the time nor the desire to > continue in this role. Would anyone like to take over maintainership? Very sorry to hear this. I'll take up lps

[Fink-devel] lpsolve looking for new maintainer

2007-02-06 Thread Trevor Harmon
I'm the official maintainer of the lpsolve and lpsolve-java packages, but unfortunately I no longer have the time nor the desire to continue in this role. Would anyone like to take over maintainership? Thanks, Trevor -

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps

2007-02-06 Thread William Scott
Alexander Hansen wrote: > You'd have to rebuild the package--the Depends information is coded > into the .deb file. (or you could manually unpack the .deb file, edit > the control file, and repack it). Being a professional lazy person, I found out that you can use dpkg to force-install

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

2007-02-06 Thread balaurici daici
Anyone can add KTorrent 2.1 final to fink? Thank you! On 2/6/07, Kasper Peeters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As dmacks points out, there is one problem with the modglue package: The > > compatibility_version of the dylibs is 0.0.0. > > I have made an updated version which is now using -version-i

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

2007-02-06 Thread Kasper Peeters
> As dmacks points out, there is one problem with the modglue package: The > compatibility_version of the dylibs is 0.0.0. I have made an updated version which is now using -version-info instead of -release. It's available at http://www.aei.mpg.de/~peekas/modglue/modglue-1.3.tar.gz Can one of

Re: [Fink-devel] why is our dpkg so old?

2007-02-06 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 2/6/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I am getting swamped with reports from users about gcc42 installation > problems due to the new tar in unstable. I've looked through the Debian > unstable changelogs for tar and dpkg and don't see any patches specifically > for this issue. How

[Fink-devel] why is our dpkg so old?

2007-02-06 Thread Jack Howarth
I am getting swamped with reports from users about gcc42 installation problems due to the new tar in unstable. I've looked through the Debian unstable changelogs for tar and dpkg and don't see any patches specifically for this issue. However I did notice that our dpkg is much older than theirs.