[Fink-devel] ocaml and Leopard

2007-06-20 Thread Jack Howarth
Speaking of fink and Leopard, does anyone understand the build failure of the ocaml package in 10.5 unstable? I am seeing... gcc -I../byterun -DCAML_NAME_SPACE -DNATIVE_CODE -DTARGET_power -DSYS_rhapsody -O -Wall -DDARWIN_VERSION_6 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_REENTRANT -I/sw/include -c -o si

Re: [Fink-devel] soap-lite-pm downgraded upstream

2007-06-20 Thread Alexander k. Hansen
Koen van der Drift wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which > I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/ > dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only > 0.60a is listed on cpan. > > Is it ok to down

Re: [Fink-devel] soap-lite-pm downgraded upstream

2007-06-20 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which > I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/ > dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only > 0.

[Fink-devel] soap-lite-pm downgraded upstream

2007-06-20 Thread Koen van der Drift
Hi, Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/ dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only 0.60a is listed on cpan. Is it ok to downgrade the package in fink, or will that

Re: [Fink-devel] gnu extension obstack.h

2007-06-20 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:49 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 03:39:48PM -0500, Robert T Wyatt wrote: >>> Does anyone here know if one of the fink packages includes a GNU >>> extension known as obstack.h? >>> >>> I'm trying to build a package related to

Re: [Fink-devel] gnu extension obstack.h

2007-06-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:49 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 03:39:48PM -0500, Robert T Wyatt wrote: > > Does anyone here know if one of the fink packages includes a GNU > > extension known as obstack.h? > > > > I'm trying to build a package related to openstreetmap.org and th

Re: [Fink-devel] gnu extension obstack.h

2007-06-20 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 03:39:48PM -0500, Robert T Wyatt wrote: > Does anyone here know if one of the fink packages includes a GNU > extension known as obstack.h? > > I'm trying to build a package related to openstreetmap.org and the new > revision of that file asks for this. In the meantime, th

[Fink-devel] gnu extension obstack.h

2007-06-20 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Does anyone here know if one of the fink packages includes a GNU extension known as obstack.h? I'm trying to build a package related to openstreetmap.org and the new revision of that file asks for this. In the meantime, the package author is reverting to normal C code. > gosmore.cc:18:63: erro

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap23-2.3.27-10

2007-06-20 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Interesting...I don't have the issue on my system: otool -L /sw/sbin/slapd /sw/sbin/slapd: /sw/lib/libsasl2.2.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0, current version 3.22.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 88.1.7) /usr/lib/libresolv.9.

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink on WWDC Leopard

2007-06-20 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Martin Costabel wrote: > David R. Morrison wrote: > [] > >> fink-0.24.3.tar.gz, released last Friday, is known to work. >> > > 0.27.3, perhaps? > > The English-language version of the download page has been updated to reflect this (it had previously referenced 0.27.1, which was adequa

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink on WWDC Leopard

2007-06-20 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: [] > fink-0.24.3.tar.gz, released last Friday, is known to work. 0.27.3, perhaps? -- Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 expres