Daniel Macks wrote:
> I had the older libquicktime0 libquicktime0-shlibs libquicktime0-bin
> packages installed from version 0.9.4-13. Now I tried to update
> libquicktime0 to its new 0.9.10 package (along with the newer
> dependency libquicktime0-shlibs):
>
> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i
> /sw/fink/d
On Jul 21, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Dave,
>Why remove the gc package when you could just add a BuildDepends
> on cctools (>= 622-1)? Actually, if more packages had such
> dependencies
> it might help accelerate the addition of an Xcode virtual package
> to fink (to make the r
Glenn Kerbein wrote:
> Where would I be able to find fink's perl module documentation? I
> can't seem to find it on finkproject.org.
>
>
In section 3 of the man pages::
/sw/share/man
/sw/share/man/man3
/sw/share/man/man3/Fink.3pm
/sw/share/man/man3/Fink::Base.3pm
/sw/share/man/man3/Fink::Boo
Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
> Regards to what you say, does it mean the freetype219 package could be set to
> replace freetype2 ?
Freetype2 has a long tradition of incompatibility between different
versions. Fink was therefore forced to keep simultaneously two versions
of freetype2 around - in
I had the older libquicktime0 libquicktime0-shlibs libquicktime0-bin
packages installed from version 0.9.4-13. Now I tried to update
libquicktime0 to its new 0.9.10 package (along with the newer
dependency libquicktime0-shlibs):
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-
On 21/07/07, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose that ruby16 join the list of obsolete versions of language
> packages that we won't support in 10.5. (The others already on this
> list are perl581, perl581, python23, and java13.) We would retain
> ruby 18.
>
> Does anybody fo
