Re: [Fink-devel] wxpython-py24-2.5.2.8-1003: GLib-WARNING **: poll(2) failed due to: Invalid argument

2007-07-24 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:08:31PM -0700, James P. Crutchfield wrote: > fink install of wxpython-py24 (v. 2.5.2.8-1003) > OS X 10.4.10 on both Intel and PPC > > Program: > > import wx > from time import * > > a = wx.PySimpleApp() > b = wx.Frame(None) > b.Show(True) > a.MainLoop() > > When run s

[Fink-devel] wxpython-py24-2.5.2.8-1003: GLib-WARNING **: poll(2) failed due to: Invalid argument

2007-07-24 Thread James P. Crutchfield
Dear fink-devel, The following near-fatal error has put a halt on a number of Python projects. Any and all help much appreciated. Regards, Jim James P. CrutchfieldProfessor Computational Science & Engineering Center

Re: [Fink-devel] Trouble installing libquicktime0-0.9.10

2007-07-24 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Jul 23, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Daniel Macks wrote: >> I had the older libquicktime0 libquicktime0-shlibs libquicktime0-bin >> packages installed from version 0.9.4-13. Now I tried to update >> libquicktime0 to its new 0.9.10 package (along with the newer >> dependency libq

Re: [Fink-devel] wxgtk-2.5.2.8-1005

2007-07-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > It shouldn't matter. Fink binaries are intended to be identical no > matter who builds them. > > And actually, the Source->Install command can fetch a binary instead, if > the binary version is the latest. And conversely, the command sudo apt-get install wxgtk=2.

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

2007-07-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:26:13PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: >> Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >> [] >>> The origin of the problem seems obvious: missing space before \ in >>> >>> -DHAS_TMPL_RETENTION\ >>> >>> but I did not find how to fix it. Any idea? >> Try >> >>fink re

Re: [Fink-devel] wxgtk-2.5.2.8-1005

2007-07-24 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
It shouldn't matter. Fink binaries are intended to be identical no matter who builds them. And actually, the Source->Install command can fetch a binary instead, if the binary version is the latest. Fink Commander hasn't been extensively modified in a while, while the fink tool (called by FC's

Re: [Fink-devel] wxgtk-2.5.2.8-1005

2007-07-24 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Joel LeBlanc wrote: > > I get the following error when trying to install from source... > > > The following package will be installed or updated: > wxgtk > Reading buildlock packages... > Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies! > > Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You

[Fink-devel] wxgtk-2.5.2.8-1005

2007-07-24 Thread Joel LeBlanc
I get the following error when trying to install from source... The following package will be installed or updated: wxgtk Reading buildlock packages... Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies! Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You may be able to fix things by runn

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

2007-07-24 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:26:13PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > [] > > The origin of the problem seems obvious: missing space before \ in > > > > -DHAS_TMPL_RETENTION\ > > > > but I did not find how to fix it. Any idea? > > Try > >fink remove make So the com

Re: [Fink-devel] Trouble installing libquicktime0-0.9.10

2007-07-24 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> Daniel Macks wrote: >>> I had the older libquicktime0 libquicktime0-shlibs libquicktime0-bin >>> packages installed from version 0.9.4-13. Now I tried to update >>> libquicktime0 to its new 0.9.10 package (a

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

2007-07-24 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 24 Jul 2007, at 08:42, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >>fink remove make > Note that auctex depends on make. and a couple of other emacs modules too.. JF - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping t

Re: [Fink-devel] Trouble installing libquicktime0-0.9.10

2007-07-24 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Jul 23, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Daniel Macks wrote: >> I had the older libquicktime0 libquicktime0-shlibs libquicktime0-bin >> packages installed from version 0.9.4-13. Now I tried to update >> libquicktime0 to its new 0.9.10 package (along with the newer >> dependency libq

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

2007-07-24 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
> Try > >fink remove make That's it, thanks. This is the second time you give this hint. How do you guess? Note that auctex depends on make. Dominique - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping thr

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

2007-07-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Dominique Dhumieres wrote: [] > The origin of the problem seems obvious: missing space before \ in > > -DHAS_TMPL_RETENTION\ > > but I did not find how to fix it. Any idea? Try fink remove make -- Martin - This SF.ne

[Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

2007-07-24 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
Building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4 with: ... /sw/src/fink.build/mozilla-1.7.13-1114/mozilla/config/nsinstall -L /sw/src/fink.build/mozilla-1.7.13-1114/mozilla/extensions/p3p/src -m 755 libp3p.dylib ../../../dist/bin/components : ../../../dist/bin/components/libp3p.dylib make[4]: Lea

[Fink-devel] Failed: phase compiling: xpdf-3.02-1001 failed

2007-07-24 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
Updating to xpdf-3.02-1001 failed on 10.4 with: ... g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./../goo -I./../fofi -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -c SplashFTFont.cc SplashFTFont.cc:15:22: error: ft2build.h: No such file or directory SplashFTFont.cc:16:10: error: #include expects "FILENAME" or

[Fink-devel] pine-ssl 4.64

2007-07-24 Thread Sven de Vries
Hi there, as pine-ssl seems to have no maintainer: is there any hope, that pine-ssl might be upgraded from 4.61 to 4.64 too (there is a non-ssl pine-4.64 already)? 4.64 fixes some security issues in earlier versions and has some new features. best sven