Re: [Fink-devel] tex4ht source changed (again)

2007-10-09 Thread Martin Costabel
Jens Noeckel wrote: > On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > >> On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I had trouble updating tex4ht from unstable (OS X 10.4) because the >>> source wasn't found. I guess after a recent fix the new source has >>> been renamed (and

Re: [Fink-devel] tex4ht source changed (again)

2007-10-09 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > >> Hi, >> I had trouble updating tex4ht from unstable (OS X 10.4) because the >> source wasn't found. I guess after a recent fix the new source has >> been renamed (and replaced). >> Things insta

Re: [Fink-devel] tex4ht source changed (again)

2007-10-09 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > Hi, > I had trouble updating tex4ht from unstable (OS X 10.4) because the > source wasn't found. I guess after a recent fix the new source has > been renamed (and replaced). > Things installed fine after I changed the source and md5 checksum > app

[Fink-devel] tex4ht source changed (again)

2007-10-09 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, I had trouble updating tex4ht from unstable (OS X 10.4) because the source wasn't found. I guess after a recent fix the new source has been renamed (and replaced). Things installed fine after I changed the source and md5 checksum appropriately as shown in the patch below. The new version

Re: [Fink-devel] pdb website bug

2007-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Costabel wrote: > Maybe the thing that's not working is the same as the one that makes > that the rsync mirrors aren't updating? Could be; I got your previous e-mail while on vacation, so didn't really have time to look at it closely. If mas

Re: [Fink-devel] pdb website bug

2007-10-09 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Koen van der Drift wrote: > >> Thanks. BTW, how often is the pdb renewed on the website? I >> committed a package a few days ago, but it still lists the old >> version. Not that important, but I thought I'd mentioned it a

Re: [Fink-devel] pdb website bug

2007-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen van der Drift wrote: > Thanks. BTW, how often is the pdb renewed on the website? I > committed a package a few days ago, but it still lists the old > version. Not that important, but I thought I'd mentioned it anyway. should be 3 times a day, m

Re: [Fink-devel] pdb website bug

2007-10-09 Thread Koen van der Drift
>> It's trivial to correct the line in scripts/pdb/dump that does this, but >> apparently there is only one person who can then push the fix to the >> actual running pdb. > >Actually, anyone who's core should be able to push the fix, I guess no >one else is watching but me, and I was away for the

Re: [Fink-devel] pdb website bug

2007-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Costabel wrote: > It's trivial to correct the line in scripts/pdb/dump that does this, but > apparently there is only one person who can then push the fix to the > actual running pdb. Actually, anyone who's core should be able to push the fi

Re: [Fink-devel] ICU

2007-10-09 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
I submitted ICU 3.8 package to tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1810234&group_id=17203&atid=414256 On 9/10/07, Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed, that fink has only outdated versions of ICU library (and > 3.1/3.2 ones are not even ports in th

Re: [Fink-devel] pdb website bug

2007-10-09 Thread Martin Costabel
Koen van der Drift wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed some nice improvements on the pdb website recently. However > right now they look very misformed. This is because the text in the > description field is all put on one line, which can make the page > very wide. All hard returns in that text are s