Re: [Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread David Reiser
On 25 Oct 2007, at 6:39:50 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: [...] > > Which packages are broken? Have the maintainers been informed? > Who is > working on fixing these packages, and do they need help? > > Like Tristan, I am very willing to help with this process. But the > process appears to lack

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: >> The ETA is "when it's ready". > > After this long of a delay, I hope people can understand if I ask for a > little more precision than that. I don't object to a ship date of "when > it's ready a

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > >> The ETA is "when it's ready". >> > > After this long of a delay, I hope people can understand if I ask for a > little more precision than that. I don't object to a ship date of "when > it's ready and no sooner", but it would help if

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > The ETA is "when it's ready". After this long of a delay, I hope people can understand if I ask for a little more precision than that. I don't object to a ship date of "when it's ready and no sooner", but it would help if we could know precisely what still remains to

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tristan Thiede wrote: > Benjamin Reed wrote: >> Robert J. Hansen wrote: >>> A year ago (October 7, 2006) I posted a message to fink-gnome-core >>> asking for information on any possible update to GTK+ 2.6. It's been a >>> year since then and Fink's G

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread Tristan Thiede
Benjamin Reed wrote: > Robert J. Hansen wrote: > > A year ago (October 7, 2006) I posted a message to fink-gnome-core > > asking for information on any possible update to GTK+ 2.6. It's been a > > year since then and Fink's GTK+ is only getting more antiquated. Has > > there been any progress in

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert J. Hansen wrote: > A year ago (October 7, 2006) I posted a message to fink-gnome-core > asking for information on any possible update to GTK+ 2.6. It's been a > year since then and Fink's GTK+ is only getting more antiquated. Has > there been

[Fink-devel] Updating to GTK+ 2.10?

2007-10-25 Thread Robert J. Hansen
A year ago (October 7, 2006) I posted a message to fink-gnome-core asking for information on any possible update to GTK+ 2.6. It's been a year since then and Fink's GTK+ is only getting more antiquated. Has there been any progress in resolving whatever issues are holding back GTK+ 2.10?