Re: [Fink-devel] How to package plugins

2008-02-17 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 18 Feb 2008, at 05:39, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > does this indeed mean that there are no libs in the -nox version _ > that any other > pkg's deps have to be on the main variant, (except if they use only > the binaries ?) the binary executables I meant .. JF ---

Re: [Fink-devel] How to package plugins

2008-02-17 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 18 Feb 2008, at 01:23, David R. Morrison wrote: > I thought I would followup on this, since I know that imagemagick was > one of the examples you had in mind. > > I couldn't find a way to get imagemagick to build binaries that > enabled plugins, without also building the plugins (and hence dra

Re: [Fink-devel] How to package plugins

2008-02-17 Thread David R. Morrison
I thought I would followup on this, since I know that imagemagick was one of the examples you had in mind. I couldn't find a way to get imagemagick to build binaries that enabled plugins, without also building the plugins (and hence dragging in all the unwanted libraries to the build). So w