Has anyone noticed that we are getting multiple linkages
for libiconv for packages that link against libfontconfig?
While fixing up the build on openmotif4, I noticed the same
problem that is seen with libgd.2.dylib from gd2...
otool -L libgd.dylib
libgd.dylib:
/sw/lib/libgd.2.dylib (co
Martin Costabel kirjoitti 3.7.2008 kello 23:24:
> Asko Kauppi wrote:
>> Just reporting a problem building "freetype2-dev" 2.1.4-12 on my
>> machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465).
>> Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)...
>> Seems I'm not the first:
>> ht
Asko Kauppi wrote:
>
> Just reporting a problem building "freetype2-dev" 2.1.4-12 on my
> machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465).
>
> Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)...
>
> Seems I'm not the first:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15
On Tue, July 1, 2008 5:20 pm, Flavio Pane wrote:
> i.e I am compiling qt3-mac on 10.4 g4, it would be nice if the binary
> package would be available for other people, how can I send the binary
> package to the mantainers?
> t.i.a
Since this indirectly involves me (qt3-mac was being built for Val
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:49:25PM +0200, Vincent Beffara wrote:
>
> Nevertheless, the general question is interesting in itself. What to do
> if one wants to follow the SVN version of a package ? Can one assume
> that the build machine will have network access ? (It kind of has to
> if only to do
Just reporting a problem building "freetype2-dev" 2.1.4-12 on my
machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465).
Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)...
Seems I'm not the first:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15268.html
But there's no solution t
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 03:36:20PM +0200, Vincent Beffara wrote:
> > > (i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch
> > > script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The
> > > base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server ...
> >
> >
On 03 Jul 2008, at 03:19, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Do you mean that you have the MacOSForge 2.2.3 release of Xorg
> installed?
No _ fink's xorg pkg.
Any evidence that MacOSForge's might build on 10.4 ??
(I'd give it a try then )
JF
---
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 09:36:20 Vincent Beffara wrote:
(i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a
patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision
number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the serv
> > > > (i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a
> > > > patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision
> > > > number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server
> > > > ...
> > >
> > > An acceptable method (that has been used by so
On Thursday 03 July 2008 09:36:20 Vincent Beffara wrote:
> > > (i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a
> > > patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision
> > > number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server
> > > ...
> >
> > An
> > (i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch
> > script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The
> > base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server ...
>
> An acceptable method (that has been used by some packages) is to get the
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
