The cure was simply to remove the older version of gtk+2-dev ; it
appears to conflict with the build
On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:46 PM, William Scott wrote:
> I'm getting this failure on 10.4 with pangocairo, on both my intel
> and ppc machines, which I believe are up to date with everything
Last night, the massive gnome update which has been in process for
many months was merged into fink's unstable tree. This is well
tested, and updates by users appear to be going fairly smoothly.
Today, we will merge the gnome update into the stable tree. Because
we have been unable to test
Forwarded message from "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Last night, the massive gnome update which has been in process for
>many months was merged into fink's unstable tree. This is well
>tested, and updates by users appear to be going fairly smoothly.
>
>Today, we will merge the gnom
I'm getting this failure on 10.4 with pangocairo, on both my intel and
ppc machines, which I believe are up to date with everything.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../gtk -
I../../../gtk -I../../../gdk -I../../../gdk -
DGTK_PRINT_BACKEND_ENABLE_UNSUPPORTED -I/sw/l
alpine, as Hisashi suggested, seems to build and work fine.
Should we yank pine from the new distribution, or make it a package
that installs a symbolic link to %p/bin/alpine ?
William G. Scott
Contact info:
http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/
On Jul 15, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Martin Costabel wr
William Scott wrote:
> Here is what I get when trying to update pine:
>
>
> cc -L/sw/lib -g -O2 -DDEBUG -I/sw/include -DENABLE_LDAP -Dconst= -
> DSYSTYPE=\"OSX\" -o pine addrbook.o adrbkcmd.o adrbklib.o args.o
> bldaddr.o context.o filter.o folder.o help.o helptext.o imap.o init.o
> mailc
Dear Hisashi:
Here is what is happening.
1. Updated pango-cairo 1 minute ago (cvs):
2. % fink list vim
Information about 7020 packages read in 1 seconds.
cmigemo-vim 1.2-8 Vim plugin to use
cmigemo
vim 7.2b.004-1 Improved ver
SourceDirectory needs to be
SourceDirectory: vim7
not 7.2
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand
Here is what I get when trying to update pine:
cc -L/sw/lib -g -O2 -DDEBUG -I/sw/include -DENABLE_LDAP -Dconst= -
DSYSTYPE=\"OSX\" -o pine addrbook.o adrbkcmd.o adrbklib.o args.o
bldaddr.o context.o filter.o folder.o help.o helptext.o imap.o init.o
mailcap.o mailcmd.o mailindx.o mailpart.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 07:38:13PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
> []
> > All of unstable is coherently using the pango1-xft2-ft219 library
> > instead of pango1-xft2; only -ft219 should be used for anything in
> > unstable.
>
> My experience in update-all'ing from pre-pc to
On Jul 15, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
> []
>> All of unstable is coherently using the pango1-xft2-ft219 library
>> instead of pango1-xft2; only -ft219 should be used for anything in
>> unstable.
>
> My experience in update-all'ing from pre-pc to post-pc was not
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
> Another problem is that there are still quite a few packages, among them
> the central pango1-xft2-ft219 itself, that do not build on an xmkmf-less
> system. At least
>
> pango1-xft2-ft219.info
> gst-plugins-base-0.10.info
> gtkglext1.info (this is where I am hanging
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
> All of unstable is coherently using the pango1-xft2-ft219 library
> instead of pango1-xft2; only -ft219 should be used for anything in
> unstable.
My experience in update-all'ing from pre-pc to post-pc was not very
pleasant. I think now (after 7 hours of repeated update-
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:08:29AM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
> > On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks to the hard work of countless developers and testers, the
> >> "pangocairo" branch has now been merged back in
On Jul 15, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
>> Thanks to the hard work of countless developers and testers, the
>> "pangocairo" branch has now been merged back into the main distro for
>> fink's "unstable" trees for 10.4 (and 10.5
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 03:47:56 Greg Darke wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have just performed a selfupdate/update-all (after unstable was merge
> with the pangocario branch) and noticed that I am not able to build
> tightvnc anymore.
>
> Here are the details of my system (in case it helps):
> Package mana
Hi All,
I have just performed a selfupdate/update-all (after unstable was merge
with the pangocario branch) and noticed that I am not able to build
tightvnc anymore.
Here are the details of my system (in case it helps):
Package manager version: 0.28.5
OS Version: 10.5.4 (Intel)
X11 Version 2.2.3
On Monday 14 July 2008 22:21:32 Daniel Macks wrote:
> The contents of the head of pangocairo-branch are identical to
> pangocairo-post-merge. Users who were testing the pangocairo cvs
> branch on an active fink can switch back to HEAD with no dependency
> disasters or loss of sanity. Users who s
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:14:47AM +0200, Matthias Ringwald wrote:
> hi. my problem on 10.5 ppc with unstable from cvs:
>
> $ fink selfupdate
> ...
> $ fink update-all
> Password:
> Information about 7205 packages read in 2 seconds.
> Can't resolve dependency "libexif12-dev" for package
> "nauti
On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> Thanks to the hard work of countless developers and testers, the
> "pangocairo" branch has now been merged back into the main distro for
> fink's "unstable" trees for 10.4 (and 10.5).
Good work, I guess :) I have been reading a lot about "pango
hi. my problem on 10.5 ppc with unstable from cvs:
$ fink selfupdate
...
$ fink update-all
Password:
Information about 7205 packages read in 2 seconds.
Can't resolve dependency "libexif12-dev" for package
"nautilus-2.6.3-1017" (no matching
packages/versions found)
Exiting with failure.
Ideas?
21 matches
Mail list logo
