Hello all.
I am finally in a position where I could offer a full Master mirror as
a bittorrent mirror. This is due to the fact that I have now
infrastructure which I could donate to Fink.
I do nto know whether this is a good idea or even something desirable,
so I am waiting on your input.
Thank y
We will have to give some serious consideration to
using Apple gcc-4.2 compiler from Xcode >= 3.1 shortly.
The ppl cvs which will become the next ppl release requires
gcc > 4.0.3 to build. This means that ppl > 0.9 will no
longer build against Apple's stock gcc 4.0.1 compiler.
It does build fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
|We will have to give some serious consideration to
| using Apple gcc-4.2 compiler from Xcode >= 3.1 shortly.
| The ppl cvs which will become the next ppl release requires
| gcc > 4.0.3 to build. This means that ppl > 0.9 will n
Benjamin,
The current Xcode 3.1.1 DP1 can't compile the ppl cvs.
The response from the ppl developer was...
---
Jack Howarth wrote:
>The ppl cvs only builds with the newer Apple gcc-4.2 compiler
> in Xcode 3.1. Under the default gcc 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
|I also recall having one of my bug reports against code
| generation of the Apple gcc 4.0.1 compiler closed with a
| comment that the compiler was depreciated or such. I agree
| that we can just build ppl > 0.9 with gcc-4.2 bu
Benjamin Reed wrote:
>[]
> As I'm not a compiler guru, I must be missing something. Is PPL
> something that is part of the GCC build? Googling "PPL" gives me a
> million false positives.
And "fink apropos ppl" shows nothing called "ppl".
What *is* ppl?
--
Martin
-
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Benjamin Reed wrote:
>> []
>> As I'm not a compiler guru, I must be missing something. Is PPL
>> something that is part of the GCC build? Googling "PPL" gives me a
>> million false positives.
>
> And "fink apropos ppl" shows nothing called "ppl".
> What *is* ppl?
>
htt
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:53:47PM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
> | Benjamin,
> | If it is a 10.5-gcc-4.2 branch, I would assume by default it
> | would be an opt in. Besides, I would surprised if Apple doesn't switch
> | the default compiler to gcc-4.2 for Snow Leopard so
