Hi
I've had a look at the libar package in the package tracker (a lib to
handle tar files)
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2046989&group_id=17203
The original package does not use libtool and only builds static
libraries.
I remember trying to submit a static l
On Aug 24, 2008, at 7:37 AM, Matthias Ringwald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've had a look at the libar package in the package tracker (a lib to
> handle tar files)
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2046989&group_id=17203
>
> The original package does not use libtool and only b
On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Jesse Alama wrote:
> I've got a package (wesnoth) that requires a newer gettext than what
> we've got. As it stands now, our msgfmt fails when generating some
> new
> localization message files. Any chance of uprading to, say, version
> 0.17? (That version has be
Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Jesse Alama wrote:
>
>> I've got a package (wesnoth) that requires a newer gettext than what
>> we've got. As it stands now, our msgfmt fails when generating some
>> new
>> localization message files. Any chance of upr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Alama wrote:
| What's the prognosis? What would go wrong if we just updated to 0.17?
| (I acknowledge that there's an issue with gettext, but I confess to not
| really appreciating the nature and scope of the problem.)
I had at one point looke