Hi again,
Comments below, in order:
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
without all of the extension language bindings.
So how does the following sound?
graphviz-base (no x11, no language plug-ins,
monipol wrote:
> On 28/06/2009, at 19:22, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>
>> David Fang wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback everyone.
>>> There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
>>> without all of the extension language bindings.
>>>
>>> So how does the foll
On 28/06/2009, at 19:22, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> David Fang wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback everyone.
>> There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
>> without all of the extension language bindings.
>>
>> So how does the following sound?
>>
>> graphviz-base (no
David Fang wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback everyone.
> There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
> without all of the extension language bindings.
>
> So how does the following sound?
>
> graphviz-base (no x11, no language plug-ins, just dot and friends)
graphviz-bas
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
without all of the extension language bindings.
So how does the following sound?
graphviz-base (no x11, no language plug-ins, just dot and friends)
graphviz-nox (no x11, but with 'all' language
