On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:50:24PM -0800, David Lowe wrote:
> On 17 Feb, 2010, at 7:09 PM, David Lowe wrote:
>
> > The version number i have used is "2.2.0-RC1", which is faithful to the
> > upstream version. Obviously i need to be less faithful, but what is the
> > suggested way to handle this
On 17 Feb, 2010, at 7:09 PM, David Lowe wrote:
> The version number i have used is "2.2.0-RC1", which is faithful to the
> upstream version. Obviously i need to be less faithful, but what is the
> suggested way to handle this? Would "2.2.0-rc1" cause any problems?
I seem to run into a
