Re: [Fink-devel] Help testing Mercurial 1.5

2010-03-22 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 3/22/10 11:54 PM, Pepe Barbe wrote: > I am building the new package for Mercurial 1.5 and I am having some > issues and I would appreciate some help testing. > > It seems when doing a test build under the fink, for some reason > during the Test Phase things get botched and a lot of tests fail. >

[Fink-devel] Help testing Mercurial 1.5

2010-03-22 Thread Pepe Barbe
I am building the new package for Mercurial 1.5 and I am having some issues and I would appreciate some help testing. It seems when doing a test build under the fink, for some reason during the Test Phase things get botched and a lot of tests fail. I spoke with upstream and, at least, under Sno

Re: [Fink-devel] SCons in stable

2010-03-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/22/10 5:21 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 3/22/10 9:16 AM, Vincent Beffara wrote: >> >> Hi list, >> >> Not sure whom to contact about this - my SCons 1.2 package was recently >> promoted into the stable tree, but unfortunately the patch

Re: [Fink-devel] SCons in stable

2010-03-22 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 3/22/10 9:16 AM, Vincent Beffara wrote: > > Hi list, > > Not sure whom to contact about this - my SCons 1.2 package was recently > promoted into the stable tree, but unfortunately the patch file > associated to it (devel/scons.patch) was not included. So SCons does not > build in the stable conf

[Fink-devel] SCons in stable

2010-03-22 Thread Vincent Beffara
Hi list, Not sure whom to contact about this - my SCons 1.2 package was recently promoted into the stable tree, but unfortunately the patch file associated to it (devel/scons.patch) was not included. So SCons does not build in the stable confguration, which is not optimal. Can somebody here f

Re: [Fink-devel] pls help in debugging seamonkey-2.0.

2010-03-22 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 22 Mar 2010, at 16:43, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 3/22/10 11:34 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > >> Code from the 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 branches won't build on 64-bit OS X. >> My >> local hg mozilla-central repository only started building >> successfully >> as 64bit as of approx

Re: [Fink-devel] pls help in debugging seamonkey-2.0.

2010-03-22 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 3/22/10 11:34 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > Code from the 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 branches won't build on 64-bit OS X. My > local hg mozilla-central repository only started building successfully > as 64bit as of approximately 1.9.3. Just to clarify: there's no release of anything that's tagge

Re: [Fink-devel] pls help in debugging seamonkey-2.0.

2010-03-22 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 3/22/10 11:07 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > There is info+patch file for seamonkey-2.0.3 in > http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/jfmertens/crypto/finkinfo/ > It builds, apparently correctly, on 10.5/32bit. > > On 10.5/64bit, I get : From your .info file: 51: SourceD

[Fink-devel] pls help in debugging seamonkey-2.0.

2010-03-22 Thread Jean-François Mertens
There is info+patch file for seamonkey-2.0.3 in http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/jfmertens/crypto/finkinfo/ It builds, apparently correctly, on 10.5/32bit. On 10.5/64bit, I get : > jsregexp.cpp > c++ -o jsregexp.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -DFEATURE_NANOJIT - > DJS_TRACER -D