Op 24 jun 2010, om 16:37 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> The experimental apt-shlibs violates the Shlibs policy.

Hi Alexander,

I have, due to a lack of time in the past week, only just fixed this in the 
latest apt versions. The apt-shlibs and apt-dev packages are now called 
apt7-shlibs and apt7-dev due to their version "0.7.25.3"; I considered it 
overkill (for now) to call them apt725-shlibs. Could you please confirm that 
was a good choice and that the original policy violation in the packages is 
gone?

Files in the experimental package are still the same:
$ dpkg -L apt7-shlibs
/.
/sw
/sw/lib
/sw/lib/libapt-inst.1.1.0.dylib
/sw/lib/libapt-pkg.4.8.0.dylib
/sw/share
/sw/share/doc
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs/AUTHORS
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs/COPYING
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs/COPYING.GPL
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs/README.arch
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs/README.ddtp
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs/README.make
/sw/share/doc/apt7-shlibs/README.progress-reporting
/sw/lib/libapt-inst.1.1.dylib
/sw/lib/libapt-pkg.4.8.dylib

I'm offline at this moment. This e-mail will be sent as soon as I go online 
again, and I'll upload the new .info file to my experimental as soon as 
possible then. It will have version 0.7.25.3-5.

> Hmm, seems like the AutoRemover destroyed something which really
> shouldn't happen. Please file a bug report against apt.
> 
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:

I will check the ChangeLog of apt releases after this one, which will hopefully 
point out where this bug was fixed. I'll then bump the package to that newer 
version if I can find one. Weird thing is - I also have an unofficial bindist 
for unstable, and I've never seen this bug before. Did you ever have it again 
after unstable-apt solved the particular problem? Or do you have any other 
ideas why this would be happening? The version of apt I packaged is actually in 
use by a stable version of Ubuntu, so I would have guessed it did not have bugs 
like this...

Thanks,
Sjors
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to