Re: [Fink-devel] Failure of -pm5100 package selftests on 10.6/i386

2010-07-22 Thread Robert Wyatt
Robert Wyatt wrote: > Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> On 07/22/2010 04:08 AM, Daniel E. Macks wrote: >> >>> 2. Figure out a shell env var or other way to make sure that the >>> spawned interp is run with the correct arch. At various times in >>> various contexts, we use ARCHFLAGS="" (I think that only

Re: [Fink-devel] Failure of -pm5100 package selftests on 10.6/i386

2010-07-22 Thread Robert Wyatt
Peter O'Gorman wrote: On 07/22/2010 04:08 AM, Daniel E. Macks wrote: 2. Figure out a shell env var or other way to make sure that the spawned interp is run with the correct arch. At various times in various contexts, we use ARCHFLAGS="" (I think that only affects the compiling of C-code modu

Re: [Fink-devel] Failure of -pm5100 package selftests on 10.6/i386

2010-07-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 07/22/2010 04:08 AM, Daniel E. Macks wrote: > > 2. Figure out a shell env var or other way to make sure that the > spawned interp is run with the correct arch. At various times in > various contexts, we use ARCHFLAGS="" (I think that only affects the > compiling of C-code modules?). That is alwa

[Fink-devel] Failure of -pm5100 package selftests on 10.6/i386

2010-07-22 Thread Daniel E. Macks
So it's "well-known" to those that know that selftest suites ('make test') of the -pm5100 variant of many perlmodule packages fails on OS X 10.6 when fink is configured for 32-bit (arch i386). If you didn't know, now you do. I spent a few hours hacking the internals of ExtUtils::MakeMaker and Test: