If I could make a small suggestion on this thread. Fink's support for 10.4
will end fairly soon, so it would not be such a bad thing if gcc 4.5.1 only
runs on 10.5 and 10.6.
-- Dave
On Aug 11, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:48:45PM -0400, Alexander Hanse
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:48:45PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/11/10 4:56 PM, Jack Fink wrote:
> > Salut Jack,
> > the problem on 10.4-i386 (with 2 dwarves) is that the build tries to build
> > something as x86_64, which can't succeed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/11/10 4:56 PM, Jack Fink wrote:
> Salut Jack,
> the problem on 10.4-i386 (with 2 dwarves) is that the build tries to build
> something as x86_64, which can't succeed with a 32bit libc.dylib.
> Cheers (and thanks for putting that much brain/time/e
Salut Jack,
the problem on 10.4-i386 (with 2 dwarves) is that the build tries to build
something as x86_64, which can't succeed with a 32bit libc.dylib.
Cheers (and thanks for putting that much brain/time/effort into gcc!)
-jack
--- Jack Howarth schrieb am Mi, 11.8.2010:
> Von: Jack Howarth
>
Hanspeter Niederstrasser said:
> 10.5/unstable:
>
> archive-tar-pm588 TestDepends on test-pod-pm which Depends on
> module-build-pm which Depends on module-build-pm588 which Depends on
> archive-tar-pm588. And round and round we go.
>
> $ fink -m --build-as-nobody build archive-tar-pm588
> Infor
[...]
>>>
>>> 2. DefaultScript: that takes values of "autotools" "makemaker"
>>> "module::build"? Bonus: extensible to any other new build systems we
>>> feel like supporting, and lets packages get the type:perl magic even
>>> if they use autotools (or vice versa).
This sounds like the most fut
