Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-25 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/10 4:34 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > although there is no jni.h of version 1.6.0 anywhere. This looks doubly > wrong now. I don't have the time to unravel the unholy spaghetti heap of > symlinks in Apple's java stuff, but this seems to need

Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-25 Thread Martin Costabel
On 25/10/10 04:08, Benjamin Reed wrote: [] > If people's stuff using java would builddep on system-java-dev, then > we'd know whether the user had it or not. ;) But the bdep could be satisfied with an older version of system-java-dev, without fink even knowing. This might pose a problem in a si