Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-05 Thread Max Horn
PS: Some further IMHO problematic examples: w3m-ssl0.5.2-1004 Upgrade package for w3m -> this sounds as if the package provides some extra "upgraded" functionality for w3m. openssl097 0.9.7m-6 Upgrade package for old openssl097* layout -> simi

[Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-05 Thread Max Horn
Hi there, we have a bunch of "obsolete" packages, which typically only still exist to smoothly and automatically transit users to their successor packages. Typically, such packages depend on fink-obsolete-packages, which marks them as obsolete. However, I just realized that end users may not b