Re: [Fink-devel] Phased decommissioning of the unstable tree.

2011-10-05 Thread Max Horn
Am 04.10.2011 um 07:18 schrieb Daniel Macks: [...] >> I'll take that as a 'no', and we can go ahead and start Phase 1. >> >> We are not currently freezing the CVS tree. >> >> Maintainers should audit their packages in 10.4 and check for items >> that are identical in 10.4/stable and 10.4/uns

Re: [Fink-devel] Phased decommissioning of the unstable tree.

2011-10-05 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Max Horn wrote: > Also, one "reverse" case: > > Validating package file ./stable/main/finkinfo/database/sqlite3-x86_64.info... > Error: can't find patchfile "./stable/main/finkinfo/database/sqlite3.patch" That's my fault. I just deleted sqlite3-x86_64.info since it'

Re: [Fink-devel] Phased decommissioning of the unstable tree.

2011-10-05 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/5/11 10:31 AM, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 04.10.2011 um 07:18 schrieb Daniel Macks: > > [...] > >>> I'll take that as a 'no', and we can go ahead and start Phase >>> 1. >>> >>> We are not currently freezing the CVS tree. >>> >>> Maintainers sho

Re: [Fink-devel] Phased decommissioning of the unstable tree.

2011-10-05 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:31:56 +0200, Max Horn wrote: > Am 04.10.2011 um 07:18 schrieb Daniel Macks: > > > > I just did a full sweep of 10.4/unstable and (with the exception of > a > few corner cases) purged it of all .info that exactly matched the > one > in 10.4/stable (and also the parallel-name