Re: [Fink-devel] [fink-core] gettext-tools madness

2012-09-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 8/31/12 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >Why exactly are we building the entirety of gettext-tools at -O0 > in 10.7 branch when only a single source file, xgettext.c, is problematic on > older clang? The previous patch that applied -O4 to the compilation of > xgettext.c, > should work fine usi

Re: [Fink-devel] [fink-core] gettext-tools madness

2012-09-01 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 9/1/2012 10:32 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 8/31/12 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Why exactly are we building the entirety of gettext-tools at -O0 >> in 10.7 branch when only a single source file, xgettext.c, is problematic on >> older clang? The previous patch that applied -O4 to the

Re: [Fink-devel] [fink-core] gettext-tools madness

2012-09-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 9/1/12 1:07 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 9/1/2012 10:32 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 8/31/12 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Why exactly are we building the entirety of gettext-tools at -O0 >>> in 10.7 branch when only a single source file, xgettext.c, is >>> problematic on

Re: [Fink-devel] [fink-core] gettext-tools madness

2012-09-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 9/1/12 1:41 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >> On 9/1/12 1:07 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >>> On 9/1/2012 10:32 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 8/31/12 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Why exactly are we building the en

Re: [Fink-devel] [fink-core] gettext-tools madness

2012-09-01 Thread David R. Morrison
On Sep 1, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 9/1/12 1:07 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >> On 9/1/2012 10:32 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >>> On 8/31/12 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Why exactly are we building the entirety of gettext-tools at -O0 in 10.7 branch when

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-tools madness

2012-09-01 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 8/31/2012 8:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Why exactly are we building the entirety of gettext-tools at -O0 > in 10.7 branch when only a single source file, xgettext.c, is problematic on > older clang? The previous patch that applied -O4 to the compilation of > xgettext.c, > should work fine

[Fink-devel] Please, add GoldenDict and update Gimp 2.6 to 2.8.1 to Fink

2012-09-01 Thread Gustavo Benedito Reis Costa
Hello developers, Good evening! I'm new to Fink forum. I noticed Gimp 2.6 is outdated and GoldenDict isn't included in Fink list. I would like you add GoldenDict app and update Gimp for Fink, but I prefer you add GoldenDict, because it's one of most important applications of Linux. You can see

[Fink-devel] Gimp upate

2012-09-01 Thread Bill Waggoner
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:04 AM, wrote: > Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 01:03:52 -0300 > From: Gustavo Benedito Reis Costa > Subject: [Fink-devel] Please, add GoldenDict and update Gimp 2.6 to > 2.8.1 to Fink > To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Hello developers, > > Good evening! > > I'm