Me, too.
2014/05/15 6:54、David Fang のメール：
> I'm ok with obsoleteing the old and migrating to the new convention.
> You may apply fink-obsolete-packages to the R package with my name on it.
>
> Fang
>
>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 09:22:49 -0400, Jack Howarth
>> wrote:
>>I would like to purge t
I'm ok with obsoleteing the old and migrating to the new convention.
You may apply fink-obsolete-packages to the R package with my name on it.
Fang
On Wed, 14 May 2014 09:22:49 -0400, Jack Howarth
wrote:
I would like to purge the legacy r-cran-* files (which preceded the switch
to revision
On Wed, 14 May 2014 09:22:49 -0400, Jack Howarth
wrote:
I would like to purge the legacy r-cran-* files (which preceded
the switch to revision variant-based cran-*-r files). What is best
practices for this these days? My inclination is to use the full C/R/P…
C/R/P is not functionally equiva
I missed a few 2.15 variants in the cran-*-r info files. The attached diff
covers these as well.
Jack
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>I would like to purge the legacy r-cran-* files (which preceded the
> switch to revision variant-based cran-*-r files). Wha
I would like to purge the legacy r-cran-* files (which preceded the
switch to revision variant-based cran-*-r files). What is best practices
for this these days? My inclination is to use the full C/R/P…
Index: cran-boot-r.info
===
