Daniel,
What if we just set up the bindist to blacklist any GPL software with
a BuildDepends on openssl100 from building there? Since this restriction is
about binary distributions, if we only provide the user with a script to
build the package locally, I don't see how we are in violation.
what about a debian style license file
They list all different licenses which links to each license in the docs dir,
so if a file uses openssl, that file could be under that license and the rest
under gpl. I know Debian doesn’t have the same issue since it has ssl as the
base system but wouldn
> On Jun 21, 2015, at 12:29 AM, TheSin wrote:
>
> if the license says that pens can not be distributed in binary form wouldn’t
> it only be ssl that needs to be built, couldn’t other packages which only
> dynamically use the dylib still be binary distributed since it does not
> contain the op
