On Oct 18, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
wrote:
>
> Regardless of your choice, they won't be buildable on 10.11 unless the
> system-openssl-dev BuildDependency is updated/removed.
Understood - I was already pinged by a NUT user running 10.11.
Both of my packages are updated. Does
On 10/18/2015 1:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
>>
>> For people who want to test this out for their packages, but don’t always
>> live on the bleeding edge and use git master, I recommend using branch_0_39,
>> because you can then use “fink
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 11:27, Charles Lepple wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
>>
>> For people who want to test this out for their packages, but don’t always
>> live on the bleeding edge and use git master, I recommend using branch_0_39,
>> because you can th
On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
>
> For people who want to test this out for their packages, but don’t always
> live on the bleeding edge and use git master, I recommend using branch_0_39,
> because you can then use “fink selfupdate” to get newer fink releases as
> usual.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Jack Howarth
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Jack Howarth
> wrote:
>
>> Looking a bit more at the failures of make 4.x under fink, I noticed that
>> fink uses the perl system() call and MacPorts uses tcl's system() call as
>> well. However the perl docu
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Jack Howarth
wrote:
> Looking a bit more at the failures of make 4.x under fink, I noticed that
> fink uses the perl system() call and MacPorts uses tcl's system() call as
> well. However the perl documentation has the following comment...
>
> Since system does a