I agree. It should be foo-py%type_pkg[python]-doc or something similar.
-- Dave
On Dec 29, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Okay, let's resolve this...
Package: foo-py%type_pkg[python]
Version: 1
Revision: 1
Type: python (2.3 2.4)
SplitOff:
Package: foo-doc
On Dec 28, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
GNU libtool will behave differently should libtool-2.0 ever be
released (there will be libfoo.dylib and libfoo.X.dylib, removing a
redundant symlink, and libraries will, by default, link -
single_module).
Hooray!!
-- Dave
library, not the static one. So we have to use either
openssl-dev or openssl097-dev, and the latter, of course, is more
modern.
-- Dave
On Dec 28, 2005, at 9:55 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/crypto/
finkinfo
In directory sc8-pr
On Nov 28, 2005, at 12:30 PM, TheSin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So what needs to get done before we can start a 10.4 (gcc4) tree,
as the rumors that x86 will be out in Jan and it will REQUIRE gcc4
only. I'm willing to help where I can to help speed this up.
-
On Nov 27, 2005, at 1:51 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi folks,
the ethereal 0.10.9-11 package in the bindist used to be broken (in
several ways). Hence I replaced it in stable by version 0.10.12,
and somebody (I think drm) updated the bindist with a new .deb made
from that version.
From this
to guarantee cleanliness?
some combination of fink uninstall/rebuild/reinstall?
David Fang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training
/configure macro to detect and
workaround this variation in behavior, especially if this is really the
default behavior of tetex-3.0 distributions.
Thanks in advance.
David
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
On Nov 13, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Andrea Riciputi wrote:
[]
[]
g++ -g -O2 -mpowerpc -no-cpp-precomp -mcpu=7450 -o .libs/t-locale
t-locale.o -L/sw/lib ../../tests/.libs/libtests.a ../../.libs/
libgmpxx.dylib /sw/src/fink.bui
ld/gmp-4.1.4-13/gmp-4.1.4/.libs/libgmp.dylib
19:38 /sw/lib/libusb.la*
Cheers!
-dave
--
David Bacher _.. ._ ..._ .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42
On Nov 6, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi folks,
once again a university colleague of mine attempted to install Fink
on his OS X machine (and iBook with OS X 10.4.3), and once again,
an issue occurred.
This time, the installer refused to work with this error message:
Fink
On Oct 5, 2005, at 6:55 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Oct 5, 2005, at 2:56 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
If you only use apt-get, you don't need the dev tools. The new --
use-binary-dist flag in fink rather muddies the waters here,
because it seems to promise that you can use the binary dist
On Oct 5, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:18:12AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
How about if instead we actually try to make it work without the dev
tools? Things were originally designed that way... And particularly
if we ever get the project of more
On Oct 4, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Yo folks,
in the following I'd like to tell you a little story that happened
to me today... it is, unfortunately, kind of a sad story, but I
hope we can turn it into one with a happy ending eventually :-)
[snip]
Hi Max.
I've been aware
On Sep 21, 2005, at 8:57 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Sep 21, 2005, at 10:37 PM, TheSin wrote:
The following errors remain:
Unsatisfied dependency in gettext-tools: gettext (= 0.10.40-19)
To fix manually, run:
sudo apt-get install gettext-dev=0.10.40-24 gettext=0.10.40-24
Hmm,
On Sep 21, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Currently, DocFiles takes a list of filenames (including shell
globbing), and allows renaming (DocFiles:foo:bar installs the file
foo from the source dir as bar in the doc dir). A fairly common
(in gnome at least) situation is that there is more
Note that I moved freetype219 to stable in the 10.4-transitional
tree, because it was needed by something I was trying to get ready
for the move to a 10.4 tree. However, it seems that I did not move
it to stable in the 10.3 tree.
-- Dave
On Sep 6, 2005, at 10:25 AM, AIDA Shinra wrote:
I want --enable-extra-encodings.
Can you explain this, please? I do not understand your request.
-- Dave
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
On Sep 6, 2005, at 11:04 AM, AIDA Shinra wrote:
I want --enable-extra-encodings.
Can you explain this, please? I do not understand your request.
The libiconv supports some extra encodings which are disabled by
default. The /usr/lib/libiconv.2.2.0.dylib is configured with
On Sep 3, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Sep 3, 2005, at 12:19 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Somehow, you got the wrong version. libiconv-1.10-3 should compile.
Hmmm, I put the files in /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo/base (I
try to keep a similar hierarchy
Dear Fink developers,
I have updated the gettext and libiconv packages: the new versions
are currently in experimental/dmrrsn/base if anybody would like to
help test.
For gettext, in addition to bringing the program to the latest
version, the division into splitoffs has been refactored
Early testing has revealed some problems with libiconv. When fixed, I'll post a new version and notify the list. -- Dave
A new version of libiconv is now ready for testing in /experimental/
dmrrsn/base
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile
Somehow, you got the wrong version. libiconv-1.10-3 should compile.
-- Dave
On Sep 2, 2005, at 6:49 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Sep 2, 2005, at 7:44 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
You would need to do a cvs checkout of experimental/dmrrsn (or
all of experimental, if you like
On Aug 24, 2005, at 12:26 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
[]
I wouldn't object to synchronizing the version numbers of the GCC
3.1 virtual package and the real package. Currently the virtual
one is at version '3.1' and the real one uses the build number
'1175', it
On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:On Aug 23, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: An XCode Legacy Tools package is now available on ADC which provides, among other things, gcc 2.95.2 and gcc 3.1 for Tiger (and Panther). If a Tiger user installs this, fink will want to install
the damn thing failed with SSH rather than as a success story.
Thanks!
David Fang
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan
On Aug 8, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Our current policy is that one should not rely on implicit
dependencies on Essential packages. Given that %p/etc/profile.d
scriptlets are loaded by %p/bin/init.*sh that that many packages that
install profile.d scriptlets won't work if the
On Aug 14, 2005, at 5:48 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Am 14.08.2005 um 10:17 schrieb Martin Costabel:
Max Horn wrote:
Am 14.08.2005 um 07:45 schrieb Ben Willmore:
[Sorry if these are FAQs. Gmane archive search seems to be broken]
1. Some of my favourite unix programs ((x)emacs, unison)
On Aug 14, 2005, at 1:45 AM, Ben Willmore wrote:2. Building aqua software reliably requires the ability to detect the version of XCode that's being used. Is there any way to do this in a .info file?I'm not sure which differences you have in mind, but one solution to XCode changes which has been
On Aug 8, 2005, at 10:44 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Lacking instructions on how to run my own 10.4 tree
Instructions have now been added to the wiki, at
http://ldx3.psfc.mit.edu:2500/akhfinkwiki/published/The+10.4+tree
Please let me know if these need clarification or correction.
--
On Aug 8, 2005, at 10:44 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Lacking instructions on how to run my own 10.4 tree and therefore
how to find real problems with it,
Martin: I am making some instructions, but will have to wait until SF
finishes their scheduled upgrade of CVS services.
I am at the
Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition to the 10.3 binary being broken (thanks to Alexander K.
Hansen for verifying this), it seems that the 0.10.9-11 binary has
some missing dependencies. All of those are fixed in the current
stable version. So if possible it would be nice if
On Jul 26, 2005, at 12:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Peter,
You may have point regarding the 4.1 branch, but I would say that
the 4.0.2 branch is highly unlikely to be much less stable for
gfortran
than the 4.0.1 release is. Again the question really is what is the
purpose of the gcc4
On Jul 24, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Max Horn wrote:Hi there,I got some reports which indicate that the ethereal binary in the 10.3 bindist is broken (the .deb is missing the ethereal binary itself). I haven't confirmed this yet, but despite this, I wonder: What exactly would be the process these days to
On Jul 22, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Emily Jackson wrote:
Builds but can't be installed:
/bin/mv /sw/src/fink.build/root-pilot-link9-0.11.8-32/sw/lib/
python2.3 /
sw/src/fink.build/root-pilot-link9-py23-0.11.8-32/sw/lib/
mv: rename /sw/src/fink.build/root-pilot-link9-0.11.8-32/sw/lib/
python2.3 to
Begin forwarded message:From: "David R. Morrison" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: July 18, 2005 9:59:23 AM EDTTo: Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Compiling pwlib on 10.4 (Tiger) Kyle:The last errors you are getting look like a problem with mixing and matching variou
system? Do I need to rebuild/reinstall anything?
Thanks in advance,
David Fang
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts
).
I mistakenly thought it was already installed with gmp, but that wasn't
enough. Upon attempting to install libmpfr-dev, I encountered errors in
its installation:
Yes, the libmpfr-dev package clashes with gmp (maintainer cc'ed).
Thanks for the tips!
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Horton wrote:
On 2 Jul 2005, at 10:26, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Horton wrote:
|
| I don't know what to call the new tree - I originally thought that
| testing could work, but after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Sachs wrote:
On Jul 2, 2005, at 07:26, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
snip
Apart from all this, will Apple gift us the necessary infrastructure to do
this? I doubt it. That means we will have to focus a lot on getting the
necessary environment
On Jun 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, Chris Dolan wrote:
Koen,
The /sw/bin files should go in a -bin splitoff. See spreadsheet-
writeexcel-pm.info for a simple example. Note that there should
perhaps also be a -man splitoff.
-man splitoffs are not needed very often any more, due to the new
On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one.Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Matthew Sachs wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Daniel Macks wrote:
There's a bug in ./configure or libtool that causes a fork-bomb with
fort77.
I sent a patch to the fort77 maintainer on June 3rd. I haven't
received a reply yet, does
On Jun 17, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Micha Mutschler wrote:
[]
mlib.c: In function 'buffer_write':
mlib.c:179: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
'sprintf' differ
in signedness
mlib.c:192: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
[]
Failed: phase
On Jun 14, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:On Jun 14, 2005, at 4:51 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: OTOH, we could generalize the solution away from "fink's openssllinkage policy" and just add a new Restrictive/Source-Distributablelicense type. I have no doubt that some of the other
I believe that if you patch glui.h with these changes --298,299c298,299 friend struct GLUI_Rollout; friend struct GLUI_Main;--- friend GLUI_Rollout; friend GLUI_Main;562,566c562,566 friend struct GLUI_Control; friend struct GLUI_Rotation; friend struct GLUI_Translation; friend
The test versions of the installer have been revised, and I'd appreciate
testing reports.
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.0-Installer.dmg
Thanks,
Dave
---
This SF.Net email is
On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:40 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:27 AM, William Scott wrote:
I have do have separate repositories. So for this example ccp4
revision
200 is in 10.4 and revision 100 is in 10.3, and was built with 10.3.
For whatever reason, the 10.3 user is only
Bill,
I'm not sure how old those instructions are, but a few things have changed.
First, be sure that people trying to use this are putting their modifications
either at the very top or very bottom of the /sw/etc/apt/sources.list file.
(The middle sections of this file get rewritten from time to
Randal,
You appear to be running fink on 10.4, but using the 10.3 distribution.
To correct this, execute /sw/lib/fink/postinstall.pl.
-- Dave
merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
Christian == Christian Schaffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian Seriously: Could you give
On May 27, 2005, at 6:44 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
Jack,
building fails (on 10.3):
[snip]
cp ../makedef.gz .
This is the offending line. It assumes that the src directory is one
level up from the build directory (which is not the case if you are
using a custom build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) wrote:
[snip]
but it would be
best if fink knew how to properly cope with BuildConflicts.
Sadly, fink doesn't know how to properly cope with BuildConflicts, nor
is this likely to change without a complete rewrite of fink's dependency
engine. (This rewrite is
There will be an initial binary distribution for 10.4 quite soon. If any
of the fixes which folks have been making in the 10.4-transitional/unstable
tree are appropriate to be moved to stable, please do so within the next
few days.
Thanks,
Dave
BABA Yoshihiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When making a package (foo) that depends on another package in crypto tree,
should it always be in crypto tree?
For example, if foo depends either on postgresql80 or postgresql80-ssl, I
should make variants: foo and foo-ssl? What if the
I hope a few people will be willing to help test some new binary Installers
for fink (under 10.2 and 10.3) before they are released to the user
community. The files are at:
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.6.4-Installer.dmg (for 10.2)
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg
drm: Does this mean the bindist contains a snapshot of this buggy file?
I'm afraid so. I'll fix it before we officially release this (although my
travel schedule will delay the fix for a few days).
-- Dave
---
This SF.Net email is
Murali Vadivelu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to replace the requirements for libjpeg, libpng,
libtiff, etc with ImageIO.framework in Tiger? Could avoid potential
and happening conflicts between libJPEG and libjpeg, say for example.
The libJPEG/libjpeg problem happens whenever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Franois Giron wrote:
Hello,
I transmit here the detail concerning the failure of the
installation of zsh.
utils.c: In function 'adjustwinsize':
utils.c:1000: warning: implicit declaration of function 'ioctl'
utils.c: At top level:
utils.c:3460:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Zanker wrote:
Fresh install of Tiger, Xcode 2.0, latest fink. gnupg fails to build
with the following error:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../include -I../intl
-no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -g -O2 -Wall -MT ttyio.o -MD -MP
Yeah, the problem is that tiger has a very new texi2html which is incompatible
with the older version assumed by a few packages.
OTOH, fink's texi2html package has deliberately not been updated to this
newest version. So BuildDepends: texi2html should cure the problem
for now.
-- Dave
Murali Karthick Vadivelu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Link (dyld) error:
Symbol not found: __cg_jpeg_resync_to_restart
Referenced from: /System/Library/Frameworks/
ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/ImageIO.framework/
Versions/A/ImageIO
Expected in:
Dear Fink developers,
The 10.4-transitional tree has now been created; the code which lets fink
access it is present in cvs HEAD and will soon be part of the package
manager 0.24.5 release.
This new tree has been populated with packages from the 10.3 tree, with
the following modifications:
1)
I believe that g77 (based on gcc-3.4.3) will still be available under 10.4
-- Dave
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live
As soon as a new version of the fink-mirrors package propagates throught the
system, you can cure this by moving away from sourceforge as your apt-get
repository.
After updating to fink-mirrors-0.24.4.1 (and either fink-0.24.4 or fink-0.23.8)
-- being sure to allow the switch to the new apt
Dave Vasilevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok guys, I've talked with msachs some and apparently this actually
works for him:
(Panther) make clean; make CC_LIB=g++ libbreak.dylib(Tiger) make
CC=g++-3.3
Previously drm said this didn't work, so I'd like some more testing.
Hopefully
Hi Martin.
I had been very puzzled by those missing symbol problems, so I'm glad
you figured it out. The timing is excellent, because we haven't pushed
-fabi-version=1 into stable yet, or fully committed ourselves to the
Tiger upgrade strategy which uses it.
However, this discovery leaves us
Let me explain the situation as I understand it.
First, we cannot mix g++ compiles between gcc-3.3 and gcc-4.0 because
of the ABI difference.
We thought (following the documentation) that setting -fabi-version=1
would solve this. In fact, it does solve it quite nicely: if you build
everything
I don't think the SDK compatibility things are the way to go for us. If
we do this, we'll be stuck with 10.3 compatibility mode forever, right?
We may just have to make a clean break; perhaps we can put something like
Conflicts: macos ( 10.4)
into fink itself on 10.4? This would stop people
On Apr 18, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Matthew Sachs wrote:
I got word that the default for -fabi-version in 3.3 is -1, for
compatibility with 3.1. So that explains why you can't link
-fabi-version=1 packages with 3.3-built default ABI packages.
It's really infuriating that this wasn't documented. The
On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:47 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Apr 18, 2005, at 4:52 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Apr 18, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Matthew Sachs wrote:
I got word that the default for -fabi-version in 3.3 is -1, for
compatibility with 3.1. So that explains why you can't link
-fabi-version
I've got a modified version of fink configure in branch_0_24, and could use
another pair or two of eyes to help test. The main change happens if you
have an entry among your mirror choices which is not (any longer) on the
list of mirror sites.
Let me know if you have any feedback on this. I
The recommended way to disable -fabi-version=1 would be
NoSetCXXFLAGS: true
Although as Peter pointed out, with g++-3.3 -fabi-version=1 should have
absolutely no effect (since by default the abi-version *is* 1).
-- Dave
Corey Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of
Corey Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-04-13, David R. Morrison wrote:
The recommended way to disable -fabi-version=1 would be
NoSetCXXFLAGS: true
Ok.
I've noticed that -fabi-version=1 appears in the CPPFLAGS too.
Would I need to also use NoSetCXXFLAGS: true ?
If I did
-pkg/index.php
2: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/index.php
Cheers,
--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/
Life is too short for traffic.
GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D
On Apr 4, 2005, at 12:20 AM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
One open question is whether to implement a new G++-ABI field in fink
packages (which would override the default version number) or whether
to stick with the existing GCC field as the signal for whether
I've begun the implementation of the new license policy by re-licensing
all of the packages that Lars listed in the stable/crypto category,
re-licensing them in all four active trees. (I made them all Restrictive,
but put a note in DescPackaging to indicate the original license.) I'll
work on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
I've begun the implementation of the new license policy by re-licensing
all of the packages that Lars listed in the stable/crypto category,
re-licensing them in all four active trees. (I made them all Restrictive
Martin and Jean-Francois:
-fabi_version=2 is not available under gcc 3.3.
What you get when you compile using gcc 4.0 and -fabi_version=1 is all of the
new features of gcc 4.0 *except* the change in ABI.
Libraries compiled with abi_version=1 are not compatible with libraries
compiled with
Here's my take on this licensing issue, for what it's worth.
I think we should explicitly indicate that authors of .info files are
*contributing* those files to the fink project when they submit them for
inclusion in the fink trees. As contributed parts of the whole, these
files may be modified
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:48:04PM -0800, Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Mar 27, 2005, at 6:22 AM, David H. wrote:
Yes, ignoring this bullshit licensing issue all together. Four
highly paid, very well known and rather well respected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Reed wrote:
David H. wrote:
no, I am not. That are exactly the words that they told me. The
likelyhood
that we will end up in court because we violate the GPL is about 0.
Not to
mention that we are not the active party in this case
On Mar 28, 2005, at 10:08 AM, David H. wrote:
And yes, I also think that we should not adopt a policy or attitude
where we
try to go out of our way just because there might be legal
implications.
In this spirit, can we have our old slogan back? Unix software for
your Mac? (taken down because
On Mar 28, 2005, at 10:08 AM, David H. wrote:
Benjamin Reed wrote:
And where is Fink incorporated again?
That does not matter when it comes to copy right. Not at all.
Actually, what matters for copyright is the country in which the item
was published. If there are conflicting copyright laws
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Mar 28, 2005, at 10:08 AM, David H. wrote:
And yes, I also think that we should not adopt a policy or attitude
where we
try to go out of our way just because there might be legal
implications.
In this spirit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Mar 16, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
Yes, I think we do. I'll try to construct a list of packages that may
be affected.
Thanks Lars.
I guess once we have this, for each package we'll need to:
-
Anthony,
Thanks very much for this very helpful message.
I'm curious of there is any difference for software released under the
LGPL instead of the GPL. Can it legally link to openSSL?
-- Dave
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As one of the regular participants on debian-legal,
Yesterday's post about the licensing restrictions for fink's .patch files
raises an interesting set of questions.
We've never stated any licensing rules for our .info or .patch files,
although we have received contributions from hundreds of people. This
was probably a mistake.
It seemed evident
Benny Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fink has a patch for the bzip2 Makefile that enables it to build a shared
library. I would like to incorporate this patch into our tree. Can I do
this? Under which licence are the patches in fink?
Fink joined the metapkg project a few years ago, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
| Lars,
|
| Thanks for raising this issue. It has come up before, but it has perhaps
| not received the attention it deserves.
|
| My reading of the links you provided suggests that you are correct: we may
| not link GPL'd
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:15:21PM -0500, Benjamin Reed wrote:
To me, it would seem kind of arbitrary for openssl 0.9.6 to be allowed,
but 0.9.7 to not be just because we're building our own copy of it.
When Apple releases some future OS release with 0.9.7 on it, is it
magically OK suddenly?
On Mar 5, 2005, at 10:01 PM, Tony Arnold wrote:
Hi All,
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| I really wish I could propose some magic that would make everyone
happy in
| the upgrade process, but I can not.
Is package refactoring something that's planned for the future? I've
hit this a couple of times before,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
|
| | Any thoughts/suggestions?
|
| Well, we need the new gettext, I agree, but we also need for users to be
| able to run a successful selfupdate and update-all. It does not seem that
| the package
Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:21:30PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote:
Actually, Justin, buildconflicts *had* been working recently. But as Martin
points out, the buildlock system has now broken it.
That seems strange. In Engine.pm, the calls
-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.2
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:21:30PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote:
Actually, Justin, buildconflicts *had* been working recently. But as Martin
points out, the buildlock system has now broken
I'm sorry that I haven't had a chance to look into this yet.
I've added the previous version of pybliographer back into fink. You can
install it with fink install pybliographer-1.2.4-1 (although I'm afraid
that every time you run fink update-all after that, it will attempt to
update to the new
Actually, Justin, buildconflicts *had* been working recently. But as Martin
points out, the buildlock system has now broken it.
-- Dave
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT
Robert T Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
two cents from a beginner:
At 3:55 PM -0500 2/26/05, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
Buildlocks solves several problems.
Fink's dep engine isn't always smart. [snip] 'fink install
bundle-gnome' [is] very likely to run into this problem.
Good example!
Dave Vasilevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 2005, at 6:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
OK, in my opinion, this behavior as reported by Robert indicates that
the
buildlock system is not yet working as it should.
It's working fine, it's catching a bug in Fink right away rather
Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv29536
Modified Files:
Package.pm ChangeLog
Log Message:
perl-5.6 compatibiility fix for open() syntax.
I'm thinking of back-porting this to
Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone give me access to the unstable part of the
tree?
You now have CVS access.
-- Dave
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT
601 - 700 of 1724 matches
Mail list logo
