The developer community may have switched to 10.2, but is this true
of the majority of Fink users?
It is a good thing to push forward and not needlessly expend energies
trying to maintain 10.1 versions of stuff - but we should recognise that
for a fair time yet there will be a substantial 10.1 co
On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 03:05 pm, Ben Hines wrote:
the faq says:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable
If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy those .info files (and their associated .patch files, if there are any) from /sw/fink/dists/unstable
Hi,
I'd like to volunteer as a maintainer of mjpegtools
I've just ported and packaged version 1.6.0 which seems to be compiling
and running fine.
I've stuck it in the submission tracker.
Regards
James
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by
Oops, I've now done as you suggested.
Thanks
James
On Sunday, September 29, 2002, at 04:24 pm, Martin Costabel wrote:
> James Watson wrote:
>
>> (N.B. The patch is about 40KB so I had to compress it to get it into
>> the mailing list
>
> That's why there
Here's a new fink port of the library libquicktime - can someone please
put it where it's supposed to go...
(N.B. The patch is about 40KB so I had to compress it to get it into the
mailing list - but will need to
be uncompressed into CVS)
There are three packages built from the .info file
libq
