Hanspeter,
I'll try to attend to this tonight. I must first obtain a Mac with OS X 10.7.
It has been some time since I've worked with Fink, so this may not go smoothly.
Kaben
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
wrote:
> Kaben,
>
> A user has raised interest in having your pa
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> User-mode fink is useful to a very small part of the fink population,
Not so. At work I lack root on many of the *nix boxes I use, so I
regularly build and install the stuff I need in ~/local. A package
manager like fink would be a godsend for this pu
I suppose 'fink install emacs21-nox' failed during functional test...?
A log of the install attempt is posted at http://www.stochastic.net/~kaben/for_fink/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net host
NetBSD, for example, becomes root at the install phase, requesting a
password at that time, and can be rigged to use su or sudo. So this is
not unheard-of in package managers (and can be very convenient).
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Suppose fink packages optionally use fields 'BuildRequiresRoot' or
'InstallRequiresRoot'? Then fink could choose to require running as
root, and inform the user at the start when building / installing a
package requires root privs. (Depend checks would determine whether any
depends require root
Works. Side effects of prebinding queue caught me by surprise, but it's pretty neat.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable
> soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method
> for
Or switch to the rsync update method. Download and unpack
http://fink.opendarwin.org/fink/fink-0.14.0.tar.gz,
then "cd fink-0.14.0; sudo ./inject.pl /sw",
then "fink selfupdate-rsync".
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> No, that's just the server--it's having problems again. Keep
Hi;
Both of Andrea Riciputi and Kow Kuroda have noted that the packages
pyobjc-py22 and pyobjc-py23 explicitly 'Conflict' with each other. I
responded that I meant to do that. The packages would refuse to install
at the same time anyway, and I thought that marking them as Conflicting
would give
Dear fink;
Version 1.0b1 of pyobjc-py22 and -py23 has been stuck in the fink
package submission tracker for some time. Would someone at fink
consider reviewing it?
The availability of pyobjc 1.0b1 was announced by Apple in their ADC
news item of 12 July, and I'm starting to feel a little embarr
... or readline. Lack of readline support hurts my head. -- K
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> However, keep in mind that sometimes the system versions lack
> important pieces (e.g. python on Jag, which was missing the headers,
> so you couldn't build anything against it).
>
>
Per-file cvs tags of .patch files.
For foo.patch corresponding to foo.info with version 1.0 and revision 2:
$ cvs checkout -r 1.0-2 foo.patch
-- K
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Well, it still doesn't solve the problem of how to retrieve an old
> patch file that correctly matc
Add a new optional field "Patch-MD5". If this field is present then
refuse to use the .patch unless its md5sum matches. If the field isn't
present then always use the provided .patch.
This wouldn't help you match the .patch file to the .info file, but it
would prevent problems like the one you
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
> i'd like to ask that the list be moderated. i got a digest last week
> that was PURE spam. nothing from anyone on the list.
Yay!
Let me just jump on this bandwagon before it even starts to roll,
and *really strongly* agree.
-- K
---
May I have some pyobjc fans test a fink package submission?
I have been trying to prepare new pyobjc-py22-0.9-1 and pyobjc-py23-0.9-1.
They work without problems on my iBook, but not on some other computers.
I have only one computer available for testing, so would like to get
feedback from other
14 matches
Mail list logo
