[Fink-devel] package placeholder

2004-02-27 Thread Vadim Zaliva
Hi! I am building packaged (darcs) which depends on GHC which is distributed as apple package file. What is the right way to put dependency to it from fink package? Sincerely, Vadim -- "La perfection est atteinte non quand il ne reste rien a ajouter, mais quand il ne reste rien a enlever." (Ant

Re: [Fink-devel] fwbuilder, Panther, dl errors

2004-01-23 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Jan 23, 2004, at 16:04, Remi Mommsen wrote: What command to you use for linking fwbuilder? What gives 'otool -L fwbuilder'? Check that all libraries listed by otool exists at these places. zembla /Users/lord> otool -L /sw/bin/fwbuilder /sw/bin/fwbuilder: /sw/lib/libfwbuilder.5.dylib (

[Fink-devel] fwbuilder, Panther, dl errors

2004-01-23 Thread Vadim Zaliva
Hi! I am maintainer of Firewall Builder (www.fwbuilder.org). We have the software working just fine under Jaguar, but after switching to Panther I am getting some weird errors. I am banging my head on this for couple of weeks already, so I decided to seek advice from this list. The product com

[Fink-devel] firewall builder packages

2003-06-12 Thread Vadim Zaliva
Hi! I've submitted some time ago packages for Firewall Builder (www.fwbuilder.org). This is popular project and we have some interested MacOS X users. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/ index.php?func=detail&aid=742020&group_id=17203&atid=414256 Now we offer them to take .info files, drop them i

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Change of maintainer for rdesktop

2003-06-11 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 07:43 AM, Sam Johnston wrote: The only email I can find on the subject is one from Ben Hines a few weeks ago, but it fell victim to a mail filter and as such had not yet been dealt with. Anyway, with the exception of the maintainer address, the .info looks fine (

[Fink-devel] Re: GNOME1 dependency cleanup

2003-01-30 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 10:12 AM, Masanori Sekino wrote: It suggests us that we can split off gdk-pixbuf-shlibs package into no-gnome and gnome part or can build them separately. Yes, this is exactly what I would like to see. Let me know if you need help testing new package. Vadim

[Fink-devel] Re: GNOME1 dependency cleanup

2003-01-30 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 09:03 AM, Masanori Sekino wrote: I started cleaning of gnome1 package's dependency including gdk-pixbuf, gtkhtml, gnome-core. But, still, even if you will minimize dependencies there will be some. What I am talking about is about having version of gtk-pixbuf w

Re: [Fink-devel] /sw?

2003-01-30 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 01:43 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: For an install from source, the answer is yes. Thanks! -- "La perfection est atteinte non quand il ne reste rien a ajouter, mais quand il ne reste rien a enlever." (Antoine de Saint-Exupery) -

[Fink-devel] gdk-pixbuf

2003-01-30 Thread Vadim Zaliva
Hi! I have project which depends on 'gdk-pixbuf'. However gdk-pixbuf currently have ton of dependencies on GNOME stuff. I've been told that it could be compiled w/o GNOME support (if it does not find one during configure). What would be right approach to resolve this? Currently user have to in

[Fink-devel] /sw?

2003-01-28 Thread Vadim Zaliva
Is it possible to install fink with root not in /sw directory? Sincerely, Vadim -- "La perfection est atteinte non quand il ne reste rien a ajouter, mais quand il ne reste rien a enlever." (Antoine de Saint-Exupery) --- This SF.NET email is

Re: [Fink-devel] linking problem

2003-01-11 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:19 PM, Ben Hines wrote: There is no problem there. Those are all harmless warnings, your link was successful as you can see. well, it still does not starts anyway: zembla /Users/lord/src/fwbuilder/src/ipt> ./fwb_iptdyld: ./fwb_ipt Undefined symbols: __ZNS

Re: [Fink-devel] linking problem

2003-01-11 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 06:25 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: This kind of stuff usually means you're linking against some c++ library that was linked with gcc instead of g++ (or you're linking with gcc yourself, but in this case, your example showed you were linking with g++, so I assume

Re: [Fink-devel] linking problem

2003-01-11 Thread Vadim Zaliva
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 11:21 AM, Dustin Sias wrote: Have you installed Developer Tools Dec 2002? I'm having similar linking problems with sablotron. I just updated to Dec 2002 version and in fact it made things worse: ccache g++-o fwb_ipt ipt.o combinedAddress.o PolicyCom

[Fink-devel] linking problem

2003-01-11 Thread Vadim Zaliva
Hi! I am building packages for Firewall Builder (www.fwbuilder.org) and get them to the stage when they build OK on jaguar with fink. However libxml2 included there have certain bug, which prevents our software from working. To remedy this I decided to go "bleeeding edge" and to update fink to