Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-12 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 12 oct. 2006 à 20:54, Jesse W a écrit :Jean-François Mertens core.ucl.ac.be> writes: What "coreutils bug" do you mean ? I have coreutils-default installed,and re-checked the build of  docbook-dsssl-nwalsh : everything isperfect.Maybe there was a problem in your build of coreutils , Apparently t

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-12 Thread Jesse W
Jean-François Mertens core.ucl.ac.be> writes: > What "coreutils bug" do you mean ? I have coreutils-default installed, > and re-checked the build of docbook-dsssl-nwalsh : everything is > perfect. > > Maybe there was a problem in your build of coreutils , Apparently there was. I rebuilt coreut

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 9 oct. 2006 à 23:40, Daniel Macks a écrit :On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:44:03PM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Le 9 oct. 2006 ? 20:09, Jesse W a ?crit : I added /bin/ to all the commands in the InstallScript section, and  it builds fine.  It was a coreutils bug.  Nevertheless, what is the  purpose

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:44:03PM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > Le 9 oct. 2006 ? 20:09, Jesse W a ?crit : > > > >I added /bin/ to all the commands in the InstallScript section, and > >it builds fine. It was a coreutils bug. Nevertheless, what is the > >purpose of the rm lines? They don't

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 09 Oct 2006, at 13:09, Jesse W wrote: > It works. > On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:59 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: >> Le 9 oct. 2006 à 10:36, Jesse W a écrit : >> >>> In regards to the fink package docbook-dsssl-nwalsh, > >>> This came up due to the package failing to build due to a failure in >>> the se

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 9 oct. 2006 à 20:09, Jesse W a écrit : It works. On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:59 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 9 oct. 2006 à 10:36, Jesse W a écrit : In regards to the fink package docbook-dsssl-nwalsh, This came up due to the package failing to build due to a failure in the second one of the

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Jesse W
It works. On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:59 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: > Le 9 oct. 2006 à 10:36, Jesse W a écrit : > >> In regards to the fink package docbook-dsssl-nwalsh, >> This came up due to the package failing to build due to a failure in >> the second one of these statements: "rm -rf doc docsrc". Ap

[Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Jesse W
In regards to the fink package docbook-dsssl-nwalsh, to which you are a maintainer, I have a suggestion. In the InstallScript section of the .info file, there are two lines that start: "rm -rf", which remove local directories in the build directory. As best as I can figure out, they are entirel

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello Jesse,Le 9 oct. 2006 à 10:36, Jesse W a écrit :In regards to the fink package docbook-dsssl-nwalsh, to which you are a maintainer, I have a suggestion.In the InstallScript section of the .info file, there are two lines that start: "rm -rf", which remove local directories in the build director