On Jun 1, 2006, at 8:50 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 01:15 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
>
>> no soap. I wonder if ${QOF_LIBS} is 'providing' -lfoo
>>
>
> Heh, I bet they still ahve a configure check for darwin that does a
> sed
> on the generated libtool script to always buil
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 01:15 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
> no soap. I wonder if ${QOF_LIBS} is 'providing' -lfoo
>
Heh, I bet they still ahve a configure check for darwin that does a sed
on the generated libtool script to always build dylibs. I added that
years ago, and it always worked because I
On Jun 1, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:50 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
>> On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>> gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> Peter
>>
>> The module of immediate inter
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:50 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
> On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it?
> >
> > Peter
>
> The module of immediate interest is loaded by gmodule.
Ensure that the Makefile.am for
On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[snip]
> gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it?
>
> Peter
The module of immediate interest is loaded by gmodule.
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fink-devel mailin
On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:25 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
>> This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be...
>>
>> A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load
>> a .so module, but the compiler/linker only c
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:25 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
> This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be...
>
> A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load
> a .so module, but the compiler/linker only created .dylib files. The
> object in question is a Mac
Another useful fact, not mentioned on that page: these days, libtool
and its autoconf friends can automatically name bundles as .so files
if they are set up properly. Perhaps Peter O'Gorman can give some
advice on this.
-- Dave
On May 31, 2006, at 3:05 PM, David Reiser wrote:
> Thank
Thank you very much. That's what I needed to get started. The fog is
slowly lifting. Someday I'll really understand...
Dave
On May 31, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:25:50AM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
>> This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might ge
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:25:50AM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
> This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be...
>
> A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load
> a .so module, but the compiler/linker only created .dylib files. The
> object in question i
This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be...
A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load
a .so module, but the compiler/linker only created .dylib files. The
object in question is a Mach bundle. Creating a symlink x.so ->
x.dylib does allow everyt
11 matches
Mail list logo