On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 06:59 AM, Max Horn wrote:
could still make them essential again in the future). Since both are
only used as tools (yeah, bzip2 also has a lib, but fink itself is not
making use of that), this should be simple to achieve...
kdebase should be using it for the b
At 19:25 Uhr -0500 05.11.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
> In fact, bzip2 should be split off since it has a
dylib and header...
Yes, and a similar remark applies to several other "essential" packages
like gettext and ncurses.
However, making changes to essential packages without breaking thi
> In fact, bzip2 should be split off since it has a
> dylib and header...
Yes, and a similar remark applies to several other "essential" packages
like gettext and ncurses.
However, making changes to essential packages without breaking things is
tricky, to put it mildly, and I've yet to hear anyon
On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 02:10 PM, Max Horn wrote:
You are making the incorrect assumption that packages will depend on
bzip2 / curl / cvs. They don't (or shouldn't).
bzip2 has a header and a dylib, so things may need to depend on it.
The system bzip2 does not have the dylib (as t
At 17:02 Uhr -0500 05.11.2002, Jason Deraleau wrote:
> None of these should be replaced. Not only are the versions in Fink
in most cases newer, but having them as seperate packages also allows
us to provide fixes etc. at all times. OTOH there is nothing to be
gained by providing place holders
> None of these should be replaced. Not only are the versions in Fink
> in most cases newer, but having them as seperate packages also allows
> us to provide fixes etc. at all times. OTOH there is nothing to be
> gained by providing place holders for these, with the possible
> exception of the bind
On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 04:45 PM, Max Horn wrote:
As I stated on IRC. It's fine by me to put in such a package, however,
the name "system-cups" is IMO not appropriate. Rather it should be
called "cups-headers" or "cups-dev".
Figures, I see this e-mail *after* I commit system-cups. =)
> On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 04:40 PM, Jason Deraleau wrote:
> > bzip2Virtual package for the install of bzip2 included with
> > Jaguar
> > (/usr/bin/bzip2, v.1.0.2)
>
> Not sure about the others, but this one still exists because bzip2 on
> the system is static-only.
>
Bah, I don't
At 16:40 Uhr -0500 05.11.2002, Jason Deraleau wrote:
> >> I think we still need to deal with our 'cups' package. We should just
>> use
>> Apple's libraries and binaries, but provide the headers ourselves. (I
>> think
>> there is a package in experimental/rangerrick/).
>
> If no one has any
On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 04:40 PM, Jason Deraleau wrote:
bzip2Virtual package for the install of bzip2 included with
Jaguar
(/usr/bin/bzip2, v.1.0.2)
Not sure about the others, but this one still exists because bzip2 on
the system is static-only.
At 13:35 Uhr -0500 05.11.2002, Alexander Strange wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 10:30 am, David R. Morrison wrote:
I'd like to propose that the 0.5.0 release can be made in the near future,
even though the number of packages in the stable tree
> >> I think we still need to deal with our 'cups' package. We should just
> >> use
> >> Apple's libraries and binaries, but provide the headers ourselves. (I
> >> think
> >> there is a package in experimental/rangerrick/).
> >
> > If no one has any objections, I can put the package in unstable. I
Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 13:35, Alexander Strange wrote:
I think we still need to deal with our 'cups' package. We should just
use
Apple's libraries and binaries, but provide the headers ourselves. (I
think
there is a package in experimental/rangerrick/).
If no one has any
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 13:35, Alexander Strange wrote:
> I think we still need to deal with our 'cups' package. We should just use
> Apple's libraries and binaries, but provide the headers ourselves. (I think
> there is a package in experimental/rangerrick/).
If no one has any objections, I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 10:30 am, David R. Morrison wrote:
> I'd like to propose that the 0.5.0 release can be made in the near future,
> even though the number of packages in the stable tree is still small.
> I think we will have a better chance c
On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 10:30 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The one thing which I see a critical for this release is the recent
xfree86-base-4.2.1.1-1 package. (It's critical because it fixes a
problem
in XFree86 which has been reported for the next update of OS X.) So
I hope that many
I'd like to propose that the 0.5.0 release can be made in the near future,
even though the number of packages in the stable tree is still small.
I think we will have a better chance communicating to our users the need
for feedback about package stability after we've made this initial Jaguar
release
17 matches
Mail list logo
