On Apr 18, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> It looks like putting -L%b in LDFLAGS solves the problem, since that
>> occurs in the linker lines before -lruby and -lruby-static, and so %b
>> gets checked out first.
>>
>> I've u
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> It looks like putting -L%b in LDFLAGS solves the problem, since that
> occurs in the linker lines before -lruby and -lruby-static, and so %b
> gets checked out first.
>
> I've uploaded updated .info and .patch files to my experimental
> dire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michal Suchanek wrote:
| Could you try this patch, please?
|
|
| Thanks
|
| Michal
|
| -
It worked for me. So I guess we only need to apply it for 10.5, since
the issue doesn't seem to show up on 10.4?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Could you try this patch, please?
Thanks
Michal
configure.diff
Description: Binary data
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save
It looks like putting -L%b in LDFLAGS solves the problem, since that
occurs in the linker lines before -lruby and -lruby-static, and so %b
gets checked out first.
I've uploaded updated .info and .patch files to my experimental
directory:
http://www.finkdeveloper.net/svn/users/akh/experiment
My assumption was technically right, but...
On checking through my build directories, I found that in the "dirty" case
(i.e. where ruby built) there were a bunch of "-lruby-static", and, of
course, libruby-static.a is generated by ruby itself. The linker, as is its
wont, browses around the sys
Forwarding on to fink-devel and the maintainer:
In summary: ruby18 doesn't build on clean systems on 10.5.2--we're
not sure about 10.4 , in the absence of reports from that OS version.
In addition to the build logs, I've posted build directories at that
location, too, for successful (dirty
